Connect with us

News

Ginni and Clarence Thomas draw questions about Supreme Court ethics

Published

on

Clarence Thomas, the U.S. Supreme Court’s most senior justice, long celebrated by conservatives and reviled by liberals, is facing renewed scrutiny for potential conflicts of interest as he helms the court’s newly empowered conservative majority and as public opinion of the court slumps to a historic low.

Independent ethics watchdogs have raised new questions about the activism of Clarence Thomas’ wife of 34 years, Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, a longtime political consultant who lobbies for some of the same conservative causes — around abortion, gun rights and religious freedom — that are before the high court.

PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Virginia Thomas arrive at the Heritage Foundation, Oct. 21, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Virginia Thomas arrive at the Heritage Foundation, Oct. 21, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

A New Yorker magazine report last month documented a web of associations between Ginni Thomas and “conservative pressure groups that have either been involved in cases before the Court or have had members engaged in such cases.”

Thomas sits on the advisory board of a group opposing affirmative action that filed a Supreme Court amicus brief in cases the justices recently agreed to take up. She has also been highly critical in public of the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack, whose business has also come before the court.

Recently released emails obtained by the nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight, first reported by Politico, also suggest close ties between the Thomases and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who has challenged federal COVID mandates before the high court. In a June 2021 message, not independently verified by ABC News, Ginni Thomas seeks the governor’s participation in a private gathering of activists, noting that Clarence Thomas had been in contact with DeSantis “on various things of late.”

PHOTO: Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix The Court, a nonpartisan ethics watchdog, has been pressing the Supreme Court to adopt a new, enforceable ethics code. (ABC News)
PHOTO: Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix The Court, a nonpartisan ethics watchdog, has been pressing the Supreme Court to adopt a new, enforceable ethics code. (ABC News)

Neither Clarence nor Ginni Thomas responded to ABC News’ request for comment about the reports or claims of potential conflicts.

“Ginni Thomas’ activities are different from any other spouse in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix The Court, a nonpartisan ethics group. “She is more activist in political causes than any other spouse. She has more relationships with organizations that have cases that come before the justices than any spouse before.”

Ginni Thomas’ personal website says she’s “battled for conservative principles” for more than three decades, regularly advising fellow activists through her private firm, Liberty Consulting, ​and at conservative conferences.

“America is in a vicious battle for its founding principles,” Ginni Thomas told a gathering of the Council for National Policy, a conservative advocacy group, in 2018, according to video obtained by the investigative site Documented. “May we all have guns and concealed carry to handle what’s coming.”

PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Virginia, July 18, 2005. (The Washington Post via Getty Images)
PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Virginia, July 18, 2005. (The Washington Post via Getty Images)

In a 2010 interview with ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Ginni Thomas spoke about her work to oppose the Affordable Care Act. “I think the clear focus is to stop the Obama agenda,” she said at the time. (The ACA would later face three existential challenges at the Supreme Court. It survived each.)

On Jan. 6, 2021, before violence broke out at the Capitol, Ginni Thomas — who had a direct access to the Trump White House — was cheering the president’s supporters challenging the electoral vote count, writing on Facebook that morning “GOD BLESS EACH OF YOU STANDING UP or PRAYING.”

While 733 Americans now face federal charges for their alleged conduct later that day, Ginni Thomas joined an open letter in December calling congressional investigation of the attack by a Democrat-led committee a “political persecution.”

MORE: How the Jan. 6 committee is piecing together the ‘puzzle’ of the Capitol attack

PHOTO: Kate Shaw, an ABC News Supreme Court analyst and Cardozo Law professor, says the justices could shore up public confidence by taking steps to improve transparency and ethics enforcement. (ABC News)
PHOTO: Kate Shaw, an ABC News Supreme Court analyst and Cardozo Law professor, says the justices could shore up public confidence by taking steps to improve transparency and ethics enforcement. (ABC News)

Eight days after publication of the letter, former President Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court to block the committee’s request for his records. Last month, the court declined over the objection of only one justice: Clarence Thomas.

“There were some eyebrows raised when Justice Thomas was that lone vote,” said Kate Shaw, ABC News Supreme Court analyst and Cardozo Law professor. “But he did not explain himself, so we don’t actually know why he wished to take up the case.”

There are no explicit ethics guidelines that govern the activities of a justice’s spouse, experts say, but there are rules about justices avoiding conflicts of interest. Federal law requires federal judges to recuse from cases whenever their “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Roth notes, however, that there is no independent enforcement mechanism in place; it’s entirely up to the individual justice.

PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice Byron White swears in new Justice Clarence Thomas, with his wife Virginia Thomas and President George H.W. Bush and First Lady Barbara Bush, outside of the White House, Oct. 18, 1991. (Dirck Halstead/Getty Images)
PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice Byron White swears in new Justice Clarence Thomas, with his wife Virginia Thomas and President George H.W. Bush and First Lady Barbara Bush, outside of the White House, Oct. 18, 1991. (Dirck Halstead/Getty Images)

“There’s this, you know, the court of public opinion,” he said. “But the only way to punish a Supreme Court justice is through impeachment and removal, and no justice has ever been impeached and removed.”

While there is precedent of justices recusing due to family members’ involvement or association with a given case, Clarence Thomas has never recused over his wife’s political activities.

With public approval of the Supreme Court sliding to a historic low, scrutiny of the justices’ potential financial or political conflicts in cases has been growing.

MORE: Justice Clarence Thomas rebukes Biden-led confirmation hearings in new film

PHOTO: Carrie Severino, a former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and president of the conservative Judicial Crisis Network, says liberal groups are trying to intimidate the Thomases with demands for recusal. (ABC News)
PHOTO: Carrie Severino, a former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and president of the conservative Judicial Crisis Network, says liberal groups are trying to intimidate the Thomases with demands for recusal. (ABC News)

Ginni Thomas is not named in any case on the court’s docket, nor is any group of which she’s known to be part. The Thomas’ supporters see a double standard in the scrutiny of their relationship.

“There’s always attempts on the left to manufacture grounds to recuse conservative justices from cases. This strikes me as just another round of those attempts,” said Carrie Severino, a former Clarence Thomas clerk and president of the Judicial Crisis Network, a conservative legal advocacy group.

In 2011, Federal Appeals Court Judge Stephen Reinhardt, a top liberal jurist, declined to recuse himself from a case involving California’s ban on same-sex marriage despite the fact that his wife was a leader at the ACLU, which had filed an amicus brief challenging the ban.

Reinhardt defended his decision at the time, writing, “her views regarding issues of public significance are her own.”

PHOTO: Virginia Thomas and Clarence Thomas walk to the microphones for a news conference to acknowledge the vote of the Senate Judiciary Committee confirming his nomination as Judge to the Supreme Court in Alexandria Va., Oct. 15, 1991. (Corbis via Getty Images)
PHOTO: Virginia Thomas and Clarence Thomas walk to the microphones for a news conference to acknowledge the vote of the Senate Judiciary Committee confirming his nomination as Judge to the Supreme Court in Alexandria Va., Oct. 15, 1991. (Corbis via Getty Images)

“I think we live in a world where women are [and] should be able to be strong, be active and be participants in public discourse,” said Severino. “And that shouldn’t be viewed as something that necessarily reflects on exactly what their husband thinks or how he’s going to behave as well.”

For the most part, spouses of the justices have tended to steer clear from the work of the court. “My wife does not give me any advice about cooking, and I do not give her any advice about the law,” Martin Ginsburg, the late husband of former Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and a longtime tax lawyer, joked in a joint appearance at Wheaton College in 1997.

But when the justices take up a major case on affirmative action later this year, they’ll consider the views of the National Association of Scholars, a conservative nonprofit that opposes the use of race in college admissions. Ginni Thomas sits on its advisory board.

“It’s absolutely OK that Justice Breyer’s wife worked at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. It’s absolutely OK that Jane Roberts is a legal recruiter during Chief Justice Roberts’ tenure. And it’s totally fine, too, that Ginni Thomas has a political consulting firm,” said Roth. “But we need to look again at those closest to the justices.”

“If you appear to be against someone or something, then you shouldn’t be judging that someone or something,” he said.

PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas sits with his wife Virginia Thomas while he waits to speak at the Heritage Foundation, Oct, 21, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
PHOTO: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas sits with his wife Virginia Thomas while he waits to speak at the Heritage Foundation, Oct, 21, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

ABC News has learned Roth’s group, Fix the Court, has asked the Supreme Court clerk to strike the National Association of Scholars brief from the record because of the apparent conflict with Ginni Thomas.

The clerk has not yet acted on that request.

A new ABC/Ipsos poll finds more Americans, 43%, believe partisan political views rather than the basis of law (38%) are driving the justices’ decisions.

Members of Congress and outside experts say new enforceable ethics rules for the court are needed now more than ever. Even Chief Justice John Roberts acknowledged in his 2021 year-end report that “public trust is essential, not incidental” to the court’s function. ​

But Roberts opposes outside efforts to impose a new ethics code.

“I do think it could help the justices regain a little bit of the lost public trust and credibility just to say, look, you know, we ourselves are bound by some ethical guidelines that another body has imposed on us,” said Shaw. “So far, the court as an institution has been unwilling to sign on to that.”

__________________________

BY DEVIN DWYER and GABRIELLA ABDUL-HAKIM

Ginni and Clarence Thomas draw questions about Supreme Court ethics originally appeared on abcnews.go.com

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Community

People’s Club Sugar Land Is Growing — Grand Patron Mbachu Explains Why

Published

on

…Credits principled leadership, philanthropy, and a renewed commitment to “Unity, Love and Service” for the historic branch’s growing membership and influence.

SUGAR LAND, TEXAS — The recent growth and renewed visibility of the Sugar Land People’s Club of Nigeria International did not happen by accident. According to the branch’s Grand Patron, Ide Obinna Nnanyelugo Mbachu, its resurgence is rooted in something far more enduring than ceremonies, titles, or social gatherings: a commitment to putting the organization’s guiding principles into practice.

In an interview reflecting on the branch’s recent progress, Mbachu said the philosophy of “Unity, Love, and Service” remains central to the People’s Club’s identity and is increasingly defining the direction of its Sugar Land branch.

“Unity means recognizing that our individual differences must never become greater than the institution that brings us together,” Mbachu said. “Love means genuinely caring about one another—not only when we celebrate, but when members and their families face difficult moments. Service is where those values become action. If we cannot translate fellowship into service to humanity, then we have missed the purpose of the organization.”

Grand Patron, Ide Obinna Nnanyelugo Mbachu.

People’s Club of Nigeria International traces its origins to Nigeria in 1971 and has since expanded through branches in Nigeria and internationally. Sugar Land occupies a distinctive place in that history as the organization’s First International Branch.

Mbachu said that legacy carries responsibility.

“People’s Club is not simply a social club where people gather, celebrate, and go home,” he said. “At its core, it is a philanthropic institution committed to community welfare. Our fellowship must have a human purpose. We must be able to look beyond ourselves, identify needs within our communities, and respond with compassion, resources, and action.”

He pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic as one example of that philosophy at work.

“I will never forget the COVID period, when fear and uncertainty had disrupted virtually every aspect of life,” Mbachu recalled. “Members of our Sugar Land branch stepped forward to distribute food to families struggling through that crisis. People were concerned about their own safety, yet our members understood that service was most meaningful when the community needed us most. That experience demonstrated what the People’s Club should represent.”

The branch has recently experienced renewed momentum in membership. Following its successful 2026 biannual induction, 16 new members were formally admitted, while additional community members have continued to express interest in joining.

Mbachu attributes that growth partly to greater organizational visibility, active programming, and an environment where prospective members can see fellowship and community engagement working together.

He particularly credited Hon. Prof. Chris Ulasi, Group Chairman of SLPCNI, and his executive team with helping reposition the branch.

“Professor Ulasi and his team deserve tremendous credit,” Mbachu said. “Leadership requires consistency, patience, and the ability to bring different personalities together around a common objective. The progress we are witnessing reflects considerable work behind the scenes; organizing members, strengthening participation, and ensuring that the branch continues moving forward.”

Mbachu also acknowledged PCNI National President Atty. Fidelis Onyebueke, whose leadership he said has contributed to stronger relationships across the organization.

“The National President has emphasized peace, reconciliation, and mutual respect among branches,” he said. “An international organization cannot prosper when its branches operate in unnecessary conflict. His efforts to promote understanding, dialogue, and unity across the People’s Club family have contributed significantly to the stability and renewed enthusiasm we are experiencing.”

For Mbachu, however, growth cannot simply be measured by numbers. The quality and commitment of those joining remain equally important.

“Our doors are open to reputable men and women who believe in what People’s Club represents and are prepared to contribute positively,” he said. “We welcome people who value integrity, fellowship, community service, and mutual respect. Membership should never be about what title you receive; it should be about what value you bring.”

That distinction, Mbachu argues, will determine whether the current momentum becomes lasting institutional progress.

For Sugar Land People’s Club, the formula he offers is remarkably straightforward: protect unity, practice love and make service visible. “When those three principles are genuinely lived,” Mbachu said, “the organization does not have to advertise its greatness. The community will see it.”

Continue Reading

Houston

Membership Surge Continues as Dr. Nkem Ugwu Joins People’s Club

Published

on

Following a successful induction ceremony, the First International Branch continues to attract new members drawn to its tradition of friendship, service, culture, and community

SUGAR LAND, TEXAS — The Sugar Land People’s Club of Nigeria International (SLPCNI) is continuing its membership expansion following its recently concluded induction ceremony, with Dr. Nkem Ugwu becoming one of the latest community members to join the organization.

Ugwu, a Sugar Land resident originally from Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria, is an entrepreneur and mother of three sons, a mother-in-law, and a grandmother. She describes service to others, family, and community engagement as important parts of her personal and professional life.

Grand Patron Ide Obinna Nnanyelugo Mbachu addressing the September Conference of the Sugar Land PCNI

Her membership comes on the heels of the branch’s successful bi-annual induction ceremony, during which 16 new members were formally sworn in by PCNI National President Atty. Fidelis Onyebueke. The celebration attracted national leaders, patrons, and members representing branches from across the People’s Club network.

Photo from left: Hon. Chief Sir Michael Okeke; Hon. Anaeto Okakpu “Oranwezuluaku”; Grand Patron Ide Obinna Nnanyelugo Mbachu; Hon. Dr. Nkem Ugwu ; Hon. Prof. Chris Ulasi, Group Chairman; Hon. Chief, Sir Basil Mbuba; Hon. Chief Sir Dr. Uche Egbuchuam “Akudo World Wide.”

Ugwu said joining the organization provides an opportunity to develop meaningful relationships while contributing to its mission.

“I am truly excited and honored to join the prestigious People’s Club of Nigeria International, Sugar Land Branch. I look forward to getting to know fellow members, building lasting friendships, and becoming actively involved in this vibrant and welcoming community. I am especially drawn to the Club’s tradition of fellowship, service, and mutual support, and I hope to contribute my experience, energy, and passion for serving others to its continued growth.”

Grand Patron Ide Obinna Nnanyelugo Mbachu welcomed Ugwu, describing continued interest in membership as encouraging for the historic First International Branch.

Membership Chairperson Hon. Chief Udoji Achebe and Hon. Ndidi Chidume

“When people of accomplishment and community spirit continue to identify with our organization, it tells us that the values upon which People’s Club was built remain relevant. We welcome Dr. Ugwu and look forward to the experience and fellowship she brings to our family.”

Hon. Prof. Chris Ulasi, Group Chairman, said the branch’s recent induction helped showcase an organization that continues to combine Nigerian cultural heritage with community engagement in Houston.

“Our successful induction created tremendous enthusiasm, but our focus goes beyond ceremonies. We are building a stronger organization rooted in friendship, responsibility and service. Dr. Ugwu’s decision to join reflects that continuing momentum.”

One of the meeting hosts, Hon. Professor Keih George, introduces the co-meeting hosts.

Membership Chairperson Hon. Chief Udoji Achebe said the branch remains interested in individuals prepared to participate actively in its programs and fellowship.

“Membership is about belonging, but it is equally about participation and contribution. We are delighted to welcome Dr. Ugwu and other prospective members who share the principles and aspirations of People’s Club.”

For SLPCNI, the growing interest following its induction represents another chapter in the evolution of a branch with a special place in the organization’s history.

And for Ugwu, it marks the beginning of a new journey—one centered on friendship, community, and service.

Continue Reading

Houston

Membership Interest Soars After Sugar Land People’s Club’s Successful Induction

Published

on

Branch considers annual induction as August celebration of prestige, culture and comradeship inspires growing community interest

HOUSTON, TEXAS — Membership requests to the Sugar Land Branch of People’s Club of Nigeria International (PCNI) have risen significantly following its successful August induction ceremony, prompting the organization to consider making the event an annual affair.

Group Chairman, Hon. Prof. Chris Ulasi, confirmed the surge in interest, saying the branch has received numerous inquiries from prospective members since the ceremony that formally admitted 16 new members to the organization.

“The response since the induction has been remarkable. We have seen a significant increase in people asking about membership and how they can become part of the People’s Club family,” Ulasi said. “Many of them attended the event or heard about it afterward and were impressed by the fellowship, dignity, cultural pride, and genuine comradeship they witnessed.”

Ulasi said the development, including a possible change from the current bi-annual induction arrangement to an annual ceremony, would be discussed at the branch’s September general meeting.

The renewed interest in membership comes on the heels of an elaborate induction that attracted national officers, patrons, branch chairmen, members, and guests from across the People’s Club family.

National President, Atty. Fidelis Onyebueke, who presided over the swearing-in of the 16 inductees, described the event as a total success and commended the Sugar Land Branch, PCNI’s First International Branch, for what he called an exceptional celebration of fellowship, culture, service, and unity.

During the formal ceremony, each inductee was invited to the podium to take the membership oath and receive a certificate from the national president, who was assisted by PCNI Attorney Chukwuka John Ukadike.

Beyond the admission of new members, however, the event offered guests a public display of the traditions that have historically defined the People’s Club: prestige, love, service, and comradeship. Those characteristics were reflected throughout the ceremony, from the reception of national officers and interaction among members to the formal induction, cultural presentation, and extended social celebration that followed.

Grand Patron, Ide Obinna Nnanyelugo Mbachu, said the growing interest in membership was an indication that the organization’s values resonated with guests who experienced the event.

“What people witnessed was the character of People’s Club—the love among members, respect for one another, willingness to serve, and the comradeship that brings us together,” Mbachu said. “Prestige is not simply about appearance; it is about how we conduct ourselves and how we treat people. When the community sees those values demonstrated, it is understandable that others would want to become part of the organization.”

The cultural presentation was among the most visible features of the evening. Women members and associates appeared in coordinated traditional attire featuring red-pinkish blouses with matching head ties and white wrappers bearing the PCNI logo. The men wore all-white outfits complemented by customized PCNI cap pins and distinctive PCNI sashes worn as neckpieces.

The coordinated appearance created a colorful expression of Nigerian cultural identity while reinforcing the sense of unity that characterized the gathering.

As the formal program concluded, the ceremony transitioned into an extended social celebration. Members, inductees, and guests shared food and drinks before taking to the dance floor, with music and festivities continuing into the early hours of Sunday.

The presence of members and officials from different branches also gave the ceremony broader significance for Sugar Land, whose status as the First International Branch places it prominently in PCNI’s history outside Nigeria.

For Ulasi, however, the strongest indication of the event’s impact came afterward, as inquiries from prospective members continued to reach the branch.

He said that while the organization welcomes the increased interest, prospective members would be expected to understand the responsibilities and traditions associated with belonging to the People’s Club. “Membership is about much more than attending social events,” Ulasi said. “It is about service, friendship, responsibility, and commitment to one another. Those are the values we intend to preserve as the branch continues to grow.”

The September meeting is expected to consider how the branch will respond to increased membership interest and whether the success of the August ceremony provides sufficient grounds to move to an annual induction schedule. For the Sugar Land Branch, the aftermath of the August induction may prove as significant as the ceremony itself: 16 members entered the People’s Club that evening, but the celebration appears to have inspired many more to seek a place within its ranks.

Continue Reading

Trending