Connect with us

Column

Emerging Regulatory Challenges in Cybersecurity: Navigating a Global, Technological Landscape

Published

1 year ago

on

The intersection of technology, globalization, and increased connectivity has given rise to a new frontier of regulatory challenges in cybersecurity. As the digital landscape rapidly evolves, organizations and governments are grappling with the complexities of securing data, protecting critical infrastructure, and navigating the intricacies of international cooperation. This has given rise to emerging regulatory challenges that demand innovative solutions to ensure the robustness and resilience of cybersecurity measures. In this context, it is essential to understand and address these challenges as they have wide-ranging implications for privacy, innovation, and the global economy.

Emerging regulatory challenges in cybersecurity are becoming more complex as technology advances and the threat landscape continues to evolve. It is crucial for regulations to keep pace with the rapid changes in cybersecurity to effectively protect individuals, organizations, and critical infrastructure from cyber threats.

One of the key challenges in cybersecurity regulation is the global nature of cyber threats. Cyber attacks do not respect national boundaries, and regulations must be able to address this cross-border nature of cybercrime. This requires international cooperation and coordination to establish consistent standards and protocols for cybersecurity.

Another challenge is the increasing interconnectedness of devices and systems, known as the Internet of Things (IoT). This raises concerns about the security and privacy of personal data as well as the potential for widespread disruptions if these systems are compromised. Regulatory frameworks need to adapt to these new challenges and ensure that IoT devices and systems are secure by design.

Additionally, the rapid development of new technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and quantum computing present regulatory challenges in terms of ensuring that these technologies are used responsibly and ethically in the context of cybersecurity.

Furthermore, the need for data protection and privacy regulations has become more prominent with the increasing frequency of data breaches and the proliferation of personal and sensitive information online. Regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union are setting a precedent for data privacy regulations around the world.

Essentially, emerging regulatory challenges in cybersecurity require a proactive and collaborative approach from governments, regulatory bodies, and industry stakeholders to develop comprehensive and adaptable frameworks that can effectively mitigate evolving cyber threats. It is essential to strike a balance between effective cybersecurity measures and enabling the innovation and growth of digital technologies.

In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, emerging regulatory challenges in cybersecurity are presenting new obstacles for organizations and governments. These challenges stem from the increasing complexity of cyber threats, as well as the need to balance security with privacy, innovation, and international cooperation. Several examples exemplify these evolving challenges:

  1. Global Data Protection Regulations: With the implementation of regulations such as the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), organizations are encountering a web of complex compliance requirements. As data flows across international borders, companies must navigate varying data protection laws, leading to a need for a cohesive, global approach to data security.
  2. Supply Chain Security: As organizations embrace interconnected supply chains and third-party services, they are exposed to new security risks. Regulatory frameworks are struggling to keep pace with the complexities of securing a network of vendors and partners from potential cyber threats, including espionage, sabotage, or data breaches.
  3. IoT and Critical Infrastructure Protection: The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices introduces new regulatory challenges, especially in the context of critical infrastructure protection. Regulation must adapt to ensure the secure integration of these devices in sectors such as energy, transportation, and healthcare, where the potential for large-scale disruptions due to cyber-attacks is a significant concern.
  4. International Cooperation and Cybersecurity Standards: In an era of globalized cyber threats, the necessity for international coordination and standardization of cybersecurity practices is crucial. However, achieving consensus and harmonizing diverse regulatory approaches across countries poses significant regulatory challenges.

Such core concentration entails navigating emerging regulatory challenges in cybersecurity and requires the development of flexible, adaptive regulatory frameworks that address the complexities of a dynamic, global, and technological landscape. This necessitates active engagement from stakeholders across various sectors to collectively develop robust, effective regulatory solutions.

In conclusion, the emerging regulatory challenges in cybersecurity represent a pivotal juncture in the ongoing quest to secure our digital infrastructures. Tackling these challenges demands a multidimensional approach, wherein stakeholders from governments, industries, and international bodies work collaboratively to develop flexible regulatory frameworks that adapt to the evolving threat landscape. Moreover, the pursuit of effective regulatory solutions should prioritize the harmonization of diverse approaches, international cooperation, and the promotion of best practices. By navigating these challenges with agility and foresight, we can foster a cybersecurity ecosystem that not only safeguards critical assets but also nurtures innovation, respects privacy, and fortifies the digital economy against adversarial threats.

♦ Professor Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is a Nigerian Professor of Cyber Security and Information Technology Management, and holds a Chartered Manager Status, and by extension, Chartered Fellow (CMgr FCMI) by the highly Reputable Royal Chartered Management Institute.

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Anthony Obi Ogbo

Dunamis Digital Dilemma: Why Shutting Down Virtual Worship May Alienate a New Generation of Believers

Published

1 week ago

on

June 30, 2025

By

“Spirituality is no longer confined to physical sanctuaries” —Anthony Obi Ogbo

The demands of the digital and virtual age, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, are both undeniable and irreversible. The pandemic didn’t merely disrupt norms—it reshaped them. From global commerce to education and religious observance, the shift to digital platforms is now a defining feature of contemporary life. The surge in e-commerce has revolutionized how consumers behave, compelling organizations to reinvent their digital presence through social media, targeted marketing, and immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality.

Yet, while many institutions have adapted to these realities, some remain entrenched in pre-pandemic mindsets. One recent example is the Dunamis International Gospel Centre in Abuja, Nigeria, under the leadership of Pastor Paul Enenche. The church announced the suspension of its live-streamed services, citing the biblical imperative for believers to gather physically, as referenced in Hebrews 10:25.

While the theological rationale was emphasized, the practical implications—particularly financial—were conspicuously understated. Churches around the world have successfully embraced virtual platforms not just to foster spiritual connection but also to maintain financial stability through online giving systems. In contrast, Dunamis’s move appears to prioritize physical attendance at the expense of accessibility and inclusivity.

In today’s digitally integrated society, suspending virtual worship risks alienating many who have come to rely on these platforms. Individuals with health challenges, mobility issues, or who live far from church facilities depend on livestreams to remain spiritually connected. More importantly, younger generations increasingly seek faith experiences that mirror their digital-first realities—flexible, inclusive, and globally accessible. By disregarding these expectations, churches may unintentionally push away the very audiences they aim to engage.

Pastor Enenche’s decision, while perhaps grounded in spiritual intent, may prove counterproductive in practice. The younger demographic—tech-savvy, mobile, and globally aware—now expects more from institutions of faith. They are turning toward worship centers that treat digital engagement not as an afterthought but as a vital dimension of spiritual life. The hybrid church model—integrating both in-person and online elements—has emerged as a powerful strategy for expanding reach while honoring traditional values. It allows churches to be both rooted and relevant.

The decision to suspend livestreaming church services reflects a deeper tension between tradition and innovation, between preserving ritual and adapting to contemporary realities. Faith institutions today are not just places of worship; they are also cultural anchors navigating an increasingly digital society. Ignoring this evolution risks rendering the church irrelevant to a generation that lives, works, and worships online. Spirituality is no longer confined to physical sanctuaries—it’s present in podcast sermons, Zoom prayer meetings, WhatsApp devotionals, and YouTube gospel concerts.

Virtual engagement is not a dilution of faith; it is an extension of it. It makes the message of hope and redemption accessible across boundaries of geography, ability, and circumstance. The pandemic revealed this, but the future will demand it. Churches that fail to embrace digital tools risk becoming spiritual silos—isolated, inflexible, and out of touch with modern believers.

Leadership in ministry, like leadership in any other sphere, must evolve with the people it seeks to serve. Pastor Enenche and others in similar positions should not view digital transformation as a threat but as an opportunity—an opportunity to reach farther, touch deeper, and uplift more lives. The gospel, after all, is meant for all—and now, more than ever, everywhere.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Column

A President in Isolation: Why Nigeria Must Step Beyond France

Published

2 weeks ago

on

June 21, 2025

By

A man in distress nurses no pride. He goes wherever and to whomever necessary in search of help.

Earlier this year, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky made the long journey to the White House. There, he endured the discomfort of facing a skeptical audience and navigating tense optics in the Oval Office. But his country is at war with the ruthless Russian bear—it was a matter of survival. Zelensky took the bruises for the sake of his people and his presidency.

Similarly, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa defied the odds of a strained relationship with the United States under President Trump. He walked into the lion’s den, candidly stating, “We don’t have a jetliner to give.” He needed to mend a diplomatic fence buckling under the weight of American pressure. Ramaphosa swallowed the bitter pill for his country and for the office he holds.

Even former U.S. President Donald Trump, despite his bluster, flew to the Middle East with a wishlist. He returned with a super-luxury jet courtesy of the wealthy Qataris. Even rich nations, it seems, have urgent needs.

So, what does Nigeria need? And when will Nigeria’s president take the initiative to visit Washington and other world capitals in search of strategic support? Must we wait until the roof collapses before we seek shelter? Why does Nigeria’s presidential travel itinerary always end in Paris? What enduring value lies in aligning almost exclusively with a former colonial power still tethered to the resources of its former African territories?

If I were President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, I would have visited the United States months ago. I would have met with President Trump to express how Nigeria is hemorrhaging talent, losing its brightest minds and most skilled professionals to America. I would appeal for a mutually beneficial arrangement: support Nigeria in making home viable, so fewer of our people are forced to migrate.

Given Trump’s well-known anti-immigration stance—and his business-oriented mindset—a development-based partnership could prove attractive. He might even call it, “the best deal ever.”

I would emphasize the immense value Nigerian professionals bring to the U.S. economy—our doctors, nurses, engineers, and tech innovators. I would remind him of Phillip Emeagwali, whose work helped lay the groundwork for the internet, the very infrastructure that fuels today’s global economy.

I would also point to the tax contributions of Nigerians in the U.S. and underscore the fact that we are assets—not burdens—wherever we go.

While in America, I would convene a high-profile forum with Nigerian professionals in healthcare and tech. I would solicit their ideas on how to strengthen Nigeria’s systems. That meeting would showcase Nigeria’s human capital and raise respect for our contributions to the American success story.

To complement this strategy, I would travel with cultural ambassadors like Davido, Flavour, and Burna Boy—creative powerhouses who have propelled Nigerian music to global acclaim. Their presence would not only be a nod of recognition but also a marketing masterstroke to elevate Nigeria’s cultural diplomacy.

This is how to lead a nation of over 200 million energetic, talented people. This is how to harness excellence—wherever it may reside. Yet today, President Tinubu appears to be operating in a vacuum.

The United States offers vast opportunities for trade, collaboration, and growth. Ignoring such a relationship is not just short-sighted—it is counterproductive. The same logic applies to engaging other global powerhouses like China, India, and Brazil.

A “Renewed Hope” agenda without a practical roadmap for international economic cooperation is like dreaming of a sumptuous pot of soup in your sleep—you wake up hungry, but empty-handed. Only those willing to go to the market and cook will ever taste that dream.

♦ Dominic Ikeogu is a social and political commentator based in Minneapolis, USA.

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Anthony Obi Ogbo

The Novice Advantage: Rethinking Graduate Readiness in a Demanding Job Market

Published

3 weeks ago

on

June 15, 2025

By

“Employers aren’t just filling vacancies—they’re investing in solutions” —Anthony Obi Ogbo

Long before graduation, I understood that success in the job market required more than just a degree. Throughout college, I committed to internships, apprenticeships, and vacation jobs—some unpaid—solely to build the kind of professional experience that would ease my transition into the workforce. By the time I completed my NYSC at The Nigerian Guardian, I wasn’t just another fresh graduate—I was a candidate with proof of performance. I was retained on merit and even offered two cartoon columns at Guardian Express in a separate contract. That preparation made all the difference.

Today, however, many college graduates enter the job market unequipped for its demands. They speak of rejection, frustration, and a lack of experience—all valid concerns in an economy where employers no longer train novice hires from scratch. In a hyper-competitive, fast-paced, and increasingly skills-based market, the burden of preparation rests squarely on the students themselves.

There was a time when being a “novice” came with room to grow. Employers saw potential and invested in it. Now, entry-level roles often come with mid-level expectations: practical skills, strategic thinking, and an ability to contribute from day one. Employers aren’t just filling vacancies—they’re investing in solutions.

This is why it’s crucial for students to begin preparing early. That means building portfolios, seeking field-relevant internships, volunteering in areas that sharpen communication and leadership, and using every academic project as a springboard for real-world insight. These experiences add depth to a résumé and provide talking points in interviews that distinguish candidates from the crowd.

Equally important is networking. The relationships students build—with mentors, professionals, or peers—often become the very bridges that connect them to employment opportunities.

Ultimately, preparing for employment as a college student isn’t optional—it’s essential. And the sooner students begin, the better their chances of entering the workforce with confidence, clarity, and competence.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Trending