“In the criminal court of public opinion, every Nigerian is a suspect.“ —Anthony Ogbo

Nigeria is currently in a state of tension as a highly anticipated national protest unfolds, aimed at addressing issues of bad governance, economic hardship, and inflation. Hundreds of protesters, many of them young people, have gathered in central Nigeria with placards criticizing the government’s policies. A week-long nationwide protest was scheduled to begin tomorrow, Wednesday, Aug. 1.

The necessity of this event is evident as the cost of living has skyrocketed since President Bola Ahmed Tinubu took office in May of last year. Hardship has only worsened following the removal of a controversial fuel subsidy and the implementation of other reforms. The prices of essential goods have soared, access to reliable electricity remains a distant dream, and long queues for fuel are a common sight in a country that is one of the world’s top oil and gas producers. The economic situation in Nigeria at present can only be described as dire.

Protests are a legitimate and powerful means of expressing dissent in a democratic society, allowing people to voice their grievances and influence political decisions. However, if not managed properly, protests can have negative consequences such as property damage, disruptions to daily life, and the potential for violence. The 1989 anti-Structural Adjustment Program protest in Nigeria, for example, spiraled into chaos and violence, causing harm to civilians. Similarly, the End SARS protest in 2020, initially against police brutality, was marred by vandalism and violence when hijacked by criminals, resulting in the tragic deaths of innocent protesters.

There are concerns that this protest may face challenges since the organizers and the regime could not agree on the demands. Omoyele Sowore, a former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) and one of the protest’s organizers, has shared these demands with the media. Upon objective analysis, some of the demands may not be feasible and could hinder any potential compromise. For example, the protesters are calling for the regime to abolish the Senate arm of the Nigerian legislative system, retain the House of Representatives, and make lawmaking a part-time public service. How?

This proposal is not in line with democratic principles, as the executive branch does not have the authority to alter the structure of the legislative branch. The separation of powers is a fundamental aspect of democracy, ensuring that each branch of government has its own responsibilities and limitations. So how would this be implemented by President Tinubu?

Again, while the demand to suspend the 1999 constitution and replace it with a people-facilitated Constitution through a sovereign National Conference and a National Referendum is a valid point, it raises questions about President Tinubu’s constitutional authority to implement such changes.

The very foundation of the Nigerian system is built upon deceit and dishonesty.

Additionally, the call for a probe into past and present Nigerian leaders who have engaged in corruption, recover their stolen funds, and allocate them to education, healthcare, and infrastructure is commendable. However, it also highlights the potential conflict of interest among the leaders and stakeholders of the protest who may have been involved in similar activities. Every leader, past and present is corrupt. In the criminal court of public opinion, every Nigerian is a suspect. Throughout history, leaders (past and present including the protest leaders) have been plagued by corruption. In fact, the very foundation of the Nigerian system is built upon deceit and dishonesty.

Without a doubt, the upcoming protest faces challenges due to conflicting demands and questions about the feasibility of certain proposals. It is essential for all parties involved to engage in constructive dialogue and seek common ground to address the issues at hand effectively.

Given the current state of affairs in Nigeria, it is evident that there is a pressing need for some form of protest to exert pressure on the current administration. The economic and social systems in Nigeria are in disarray with Tinubu’s regime being plagued by widespread corruption, eroding trust in government institutions, and impeding economic progress. Income inequality is rampant, with a small elite class hoarding wealth while the majority of the population struggles to survive. High unemployment rates, inadequate infrastructure, and limited access to quality education and healthcare further compound the country’s challenges, perpetuating a cycle of poverty and instability.

It is imperative for all stakeholders to come together to effect meaningful change and foster a more just and equitable Nigeria. This collaborative effort should involve individuals, communities, governments, businesses, and organizations working in unison to address systemic issues such as poverty, discrimination, and inequality.

As previously mentioned, some of the demands set forth by the organizers appear to be unrealistic and lacking in feasible solutions, leading to suspicions of hidden agendas. For instance, the call for the unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu (MNK) and the “demilitarization” of the South East appears to be a strategic move to capitalize on the emotional ties of the Igbo community, particularly in the East where Kanu hails from. Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), is currently detained on terror-related charges.

It is evident that the organizers are attempting to leverage the Igbo community’s strong political sentiments to bolster their cause, despite opposition from many Igbo leaders. This tactic raises questions about the true intentions behind the protests and underscores the need for transparency and accountability in their pursuit of social change.

The decision to protest or not can hinge on specific interests or potential benefits, as different communities stand to gain or lose depending on the outcome. Unfortunately, the average business owner often finds themselves as the primary victims of the looting that can occur during these protests. It is concerning that protesters have not adequately addressed how to protect the hundreds of businesses in Abuja, Lagos, and other major northern cities that are frequently targeted and damaged during such events.

While political protests are undeniably powerful tools for advocating change, amplifying voices, and challenging the status quo, it is essential to consider the potential consequences. Protests have historically been powerful catalysts for change, shaping the course of history and driving progress. However, when lacking clear objectives, they can devolve into mere displays of violence and destruction, serving only to garner superficial attention on social media.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo,PhD, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015) Maxims of Political Leadership (2019) and The Situation Room (2024). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

• About
• Latest Posts

Texas Guardian News

INTERNATIONAL GUARDIAN is the boldest and brightest issue-oriented international newspaper published in Houston, Texas. Strategically, it strives to promote private enterprise, support responsible government and advocate social justice.

Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)

• Amanpour: Melania Trump’s ‘mainstream media’ remark is ‘dangerous’ - September 28, 2024
• Hurricane Helene kills at least 44 and causes havoc across the Southeast - September 28, 2024
• Haitian immigrant group calls for arrest warrants for Trump and Vance in Ohio - September 28, 2024

“It is worth considering whether Trump’s assassin would have been treated differently if he were Black.“ —Anthony Ogbo

On Saturday, July 13, a gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, armed with an AR-15 assault rifle, brazenly carried his killer weapon to the rooftop from a short distance to the podium where the former President, Donald Trump was addressing a political rally. Unchallenged, he fired up to eight shots toward the stage, with one shot hitting Trump’s right ear. Tragically, one rally-goer died, and two others were critically injured before the assailant was taken down by a Secret Service sniper. The shooter was identified as white.

Just a few days later, on Tuesday, five Columbus police officers in Milwaukee shot and killed a homeless man outside the security perimeter of the Republican convention. The man was waving knives at others, and residents reported that he had been living in a tent. To be precise, this incident took place about 1 mile from the convention in a residential neighborhood that included a large homeless encampment. The homeless man was Black.

Since the incident involving Trump, investigators have been diligently working to determine the cause of the attack and prevent future occurrences. They have explored various theories and possibilities as they come to terms with how the individual was able to conveniently carry out such a heinous act.

Attendees at the event had alerted local police about the shooter heading towards the rooftop. However, authorities failed to communicate this information to security personnel, potentially jeopardizing the safety of the former President. A Homeland Security law enforcement memo revealed that the shooter had recently purchased ammunition, received hazardous material shipments, and had improvised explosive devices in his car and home.

It was also reported that before the would-be assassin aimed at Trump, attendees reported they saw him pacing and behaving strangely. Crooks was not shot, rather, local police officers began pursuing him on foot. During the pursuit, the U.S. official said, local police told the Secret Service they were looking for a suspicious person near the event. Furthermore, the U.S. official said the Secret Service was told of a suspicious person before local police discovered Crooks on the roof of a nearby glass research company’s building. That discovery occurred shortly before Crooks opened fire, according to law enforcement sources.

The timing of these events raises concerns about whether additional precautions could have been implemented to prevent Crook’s actions. It is worth considering whether this assassin would have been treated differently if he had been Black. Comparing both events can provide insight into potential biases and disparities in treatment based on race.

The fact that the suspect in Trump’s assassination attempt in Pennsylvania was White and was handled with such reluctance and oversight, while the Black homeless man in Milwaukee was shot and killed instantly by police, highlights the disparities in how individuals of different races are treated by law enforcement. This raises questions about whether race played a role in how both incidents were handled and whether there are underlying biases that need to be addressed within the criminal justice system.

Authorities claimed that the fatal shooting in Milwaukee was not connected to the convention. However, this incident sheds light on larger concerns regarding the use of external law enforcement for events such as conventions. Furthermore, it is important to examine these cases closely and consider how systemic racism may be influencing outcomes in similar situations. By acknowledging these disparities, we can work towards creating a more just and equitable society for all individuals, regardless of their race.

Despite efforts to address systemic racism and improve police-community relations, recent events such as the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Daunte Wright have highlighted the ongoing challenges and injustices faced by Black Americans at the hands of law enforcement. These incidents serve as a stark reminder that there is still much work to be done to achieve true equality and justice for all individuals, regardless of race. It is clear that while progress has been made in some areas, the reality on the ground continues to show that racial disparities and police brutality remain pervasive issues in America.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo,PhD, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

• About
• Latest Posts

Texas Guardian News

INTERNATIONAL GUARDIAN is the boldest and brightest issue-oriented international newspaper published in Houston, Texas. Strategically, it strives to promote private enterprise, support responsible government and advocate social justice.

Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)

• Amanpour: Melania Trump’s ‘mainstream media’ remark is ‘dangerous’ - September 28, 2024
• Hurricane Helene kills at least 44 and causes havoc across the Southeast - September 28, 2024
• Haitian immigrant group calls for arrest warrants for Trump and Vance in Ohio - September 28, 2024

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s current leadership crisis can be likened to the principles of General George S. Patton Jr., who famously said that one can either lead him, follow him, or “get the hell” out of his way. General Patton was a no-nonsense United States Army general who led troops in World War II, and his quote has become a cornerstone for understanding the complicated art of leading. Besides other fundamental competencies in leadership, taking responsibility is crucial as it builds trust and respect, and promotes honesty, transparency, and accountability for both successes and failures. Accepting responsibility thus demonstrates integrity, humility, and a commitment to personal growth and development.

Following a devastating attack by Hamas terrorists on October 7, Israeli officials have taken responsibility for their failures in preventing the violence that led to the current conflict. However, Netanyahu has refused to accept responsibility for the situation. The attack was a horrific display of violence, with Hamas terrorists killing innocent civilians, including women and children, and taking hostages. Since the start of this conflict, Netanyahu has struggled to define his clear goals and strategies. He has been confused about dealing with his cabinet, the public, and Israeli allies – shifting blame onto others, and prioritizing his political survival over the needs of the nation.

Last week, he publicly criticized his strongest ally, the United States, for withholding weapons needed for the war. Directing sharp criticisms at President Joe Biden, he suggested that this delay was hindering Israel’s offensive in the southern Gaza city of Rafah, where ongoing fighting has worsened the already dire humanitarian situation for Palestinians. In reality, Biden had postponed the delivery of certain heavy bombs since May due to concerns about Israel’s actions resulting in civilian casualties in Gaza. However, Netanyahu conveniently omitted the fact that he had outright rejected the U.S. request to reconsider a full-scale invasion of Rafah, where over 1 million people are seeking refuge. Defiantly, he asserted that Israel would continue its mission to eradicate Hamas, with or without U.S. support.

Netanyahu’s uncompromising stance on challenging policy issues persisted as he dissolved his war Cabinet last week to consolidate his authority over military decisions. Before this move, his main political rival, Benny Gantz, a retired general and member of parliament known for his moderate views, withdrew from the three-member war Cabinet. This means that major war strategies will now be exclusively approved by Netanyahu’s security Cabinet, a larger body dominated by hard-liners who oppose the U.S.-backed cease-fire proposal and advocate for continuing the conflict.

Israel is currently facing a political dilemma with Netanyahu at the helm. The political landscape has been turbulent, with Netanyahu facing a growing opposition. This was exemplified by the recent passing of a controversial judicial overhaul bill in the Israeli parliament, sparking civil resistance. The situation escalated when reservists, including F-16 pilots, refused to fly under Netanyahu’s leadership until the anti-democratic bill was revoked. These actions not only impact military readiness but also underscore internal threats to Israel’s democracy.

In March, U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called for new elections in Israel, criticizing Netanyahu as an impediment to peace. Schumer, a long-time supporter of Israel and the highest-ranking U.S. Jewish elected official expressed concerns about Netanyahu’s government and highlighted the need for change in leadership, especially during a war that began with attacks on Israel by Hamas militants.

Schumer’s sentiments are shared by many, as Netanyahu’s prolonged tenure has raised concerns about stagnation and a lack of fresh ideas. The Prime Minister’s multiple corruption charges have also tarnished his leadership, contributing to increased polarization within Israeli society. A new leader could potentially bring innovative approaches to address pressing issues and bridge divisions within the country.

There are significant policy issues at play in Israel, particularly under Netanyahu’s leadership. His policies on settlements, security, and the peace process have sparked controversy and debate. Critics argue that his stance on settlements has impeded the possibility of a two-state solution by expanding Israeli presence in the West Bank. Furthermore, his approach to security, including military actions in Gaza and Lebanon, has been criticized as heavy-handed and counterproductive to peace efforts. The peace process itself has stagnated under his leadership, with many accusing him of prioritizing Israeli interests over finding a resolution with the Palestinians. Overall, Netanyahu’s policies have created division both domestically and internationally.

Looking ahead, the question arises: what is his strategy to effectively lead Israel? Is Netanyahu prepared to develop a comprehensive plan that combines diplomatic efforts, security measures, and economic policies? Will he prioritize strengthening relationships with key allies, such as the United States, while also working to improve ties with neighboring countries in the Middle East? Is he committed to implementing initiatives to boost Israel’s economy and address social issues within the country? Would he be open to spearheading a multifaceted plan aimed at ensuring Israel’s security and prosperity in the years ahead? Ultimately, is Netanyahu prepared to lead, follow, or step aside for the greater good?

♦Publisher  and Professor, Dr. Anthony Obi Ogbo, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

• About
• Latest Posts

Texas Guardian News

INTERNATIONAL GUARDIAN is the boldest and brightest issue-oriented international newspaper published in Houston, Texas. Strategically, it strives to promote private enterprise, support responsible government and advocate social justice.

Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)

• Amanpour: Melania Trump’s ‘mainstream media’ remark is ‘dangerous’ - September 28, 2024
• Hurricane Helene kills at least 44 and causes havoc across the Southeast - September 28, 2024
• Haitian immigrant group calls for arrest warrants for Trump and Vance in Ohio - September 28, 2024