Anthony Obi Ogbo
Nigeria: To Protest or Not to Protest
“In the criminal court of public opinion, every Nigerian is a suspect.“ —Anthony Ogbo
Nigeria is currently in a state of tension as a highly anticipated national protest unfolds, aimed at addressing issues of bad governance, economic hardship, and inflation. Hundreds of protesters, many of them young people, have gathered in central Nigeria with placards criticizing the government’s policies. A week-long nationwide protest was scheduled to begin tomorrow, Wednesday, Aug. 1.
The necessity of this event is evident as the cost of living has skyrocketed since President Bola Ahmed Tinubu took office in May of last year. Hardship has only worsened following the removal of a controversial fuel subsidy and the implementation of other reforms. The prices of essential goods have soared, access to reliable electricity remains a distant dream, and long queues for fuel are a common sight in a country that is one of the world’s top oil and gas producers. The economic situation in Nigeria at present can only be described as dire.
Protests are a legitimate and powerful means of expressing dissent in a democratic society, allowing people to voice their grievances and influence political decisions. However, if not managed properly, protests can have negative consequences such as property damage, disruptions to daily life, and the potential for violence. The 1989 anti-Structural Adjustment Program protest in Nigeria, for example, spiraled into chaos and violence, causing harm to civilians. Similarly, the End SARS protest in 2020, initially against police brutality, was marred by vandalism and violence when hijacked by criminals, resulting in the tragic deaths of innocent protesters.
There are concerns that this protest may face challenges since the organizers and the regime could not agree on the demands. Omoyele Sowore, a former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) and one of the protest’s organizers, has shared these demands with the media. Upon objective analysis, some of the demands may not be feasible and could hinder any potential compromise. For example, the protesters are calling for the regime to abolish the Senate arm of the Nigerian legislative system, retain the House of Representatives, and make lawmaking a part-time public service. How?
This proposal is not in line with democratic principles, as the executive branch does not have the authority to alter the structure of the legislative branch. The separation of powers is a fundamental aspect of democracy, ensuring that each branch of government has its own responsibilities and limitations. So how would this be implemented by President Tinubu?
Again, while the demand to suspend the 1999 constitution and replace it with a people-facilitated Constitution through a sovereign National Conference and a National Referendum is a valid point, it raises questions about President Tinubu’s constitutional authority to implement such changes.
The very foundation of the Nigerian system is built upon deceit and dishonesty.
Additionally, the call for a probe into past and present Nigerian leaders who have engaged in corruption, recover their stolen funds, and allocate them to education, healthcare, and infrastructure is commendable. However, it also highlights the potential conflict of interest among the leaders and stakeholders of the protest who may have been involved in similar activities. Every leader, past and present is corrupt. In the criminal court of public opinion, every Nigerian is a suspect. Throughout history, leaders (past and present including the protest leaders) have been plagued by corruption. In fact, the very foundation of the Nigerian system is built upon deceit and dishonesty.
Without a doubt, the upcoming protest faces challenges due to conflicting demands and questions about the feasibility of certain proposals. It is essential for all parties involved to engage in constructive dialogue and seek common ground to address the issues at hand effectively.
Given the current state of affairs in Nigeria, it is evident that there is a pressing need for some form of protest to exert pressure on the current administration. The economic and social systems in Nigeria are in disarray with Tinubu’s regime being plagued by widespread corruption, eroding trust in government institutions, and impeding economic progress. Income inequality is rampant, with a small elite class hoarding wealth while the majority of the population struggles to survive. High unemployment rates, inadequate infrastructure, and limited access to quality education and healthcare further compound the country’s challenges, perpetuating a cycle of poverty and instability.
It is imperative for all stakeholders to come together to effect meaningful change and foster a more just and equitable Nigeria. This collaborative effort should involve individuals, communities, governments, businesses, and organizations working in unison to address systemic issues such as poverty, discrimination, and inequality.
As previously mentioned, some of the demands set forth by the organizers appear to be unrealistic and lacking in feasible solutions, leading to suspicions of hidden agendas. For instance, the call for the unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu (MNK) and the “demilitarization” of the South East appears to be a strategic move to capitalize on the emotional ties of the Igbo community, particularly in the East where Kanu hails from. Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), is currently detained on terror-related charges.
It is evident that the organizers are attempting to leverage the Igbo community’s strong political sentiments to bolster their cause, despite opposition from many Igbo leaders. This tactic raises questions about the true intentions behind the protests and underscores the need for transparency and accountability in their pursuit of social change.
The decision to protest or not can hinge on specific interests or potential benefits, as different communities stand to gain or lose depending on the outcome. Unfortunately, the average business owner often finds themselves as the primary victims of the looting that can occur during these protests. It is concerning that protesters have not adequately addressed how to protect the hundreds of businesses in Abuja, Lagos, and other major northern cities that are frequently targeted and damaged during such events.
While political protests are undeniably powerful tools for advocating change, amplifying voices, and challenging the status quo, it is essential to consider the potential consequences. Protests have historically been powerful catalysts for change, shaping the course of history and driving progress. However, when lacking clear objectives, they can devolve into mere displays of violence and destruction, serving only to garner superficial attention on social media.
♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo,PhD, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015) Maxims of Political Leadership (2019) and The Situation Room (2024). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us
- Champion for the Hungry: The Legacy of Congressman Mickey Leland - November 29, 2024
- Trump demands Republicans ‘kill’ bill that would protect journalists from government spying - November 22, 2024
- USCIS Simplifies the Path to U.S. Citizenship for Long-Term Permanent Residents - November 22, 2024
Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo has sparked controversy within her Democratic Party circle by publicly endorsing the contentious $4.4 billion Houston ISD bond less than two weeks before the upcoming election. In a recent social media post, Hidalgo revealed that a recent tour of an HISD school facility had shed light on the urgent need for additional funding, despite the Texas Education Agency’s (TEA) recent takeover of the district.
The bond, which is divided into two separate propositions, has faced significant backlash in recent months. Surprisingly, both Harris County Republicans and Democrats have united in opposition to the bond, citing concerns about potential mismanagement by the current leadership.
However, Hidalgo’s stance is rooted in her firsthand observations during the school tour. She raised the alarm at the inadequate conditions she witnessed, such as a mere fence separating the exterior from six classrooms, a musty smell emanating from the library due to a damaged HVAC system, and using mobile units from 1990 that were only designed to last 10 years. Additionally, she noted that the narrow walkways and lack of proper canopies made it difficult for students and staff during inclement weather, and classrooms’ heating and cooling systems were insufficient. Indeed, Hidalgo’s decision to support the bond is based on her commitment to addressing the pressing needs of HISD students and staff, as highlighted by her eye-opening visit to the school facility.
To provide a comprehensive understanding of the Bond Proposal, let’s break it down: The proposal consists of two parts – Proposition A and Proposition B. Proposition A aims to enhance the district’s buildings and facilities. If approved, HISD will have the opportunity to borrow $3.96 billion for crucial repairs and upgrades. On the other hand, Proposition B focuses on enhancing technology in HISD schools, with a proposed borrowing of $440 million to modernize technology across all schools.
The Bond Proposal currently under consideration is undeniably significant, representing the first time in 12 years that HISD has sought funding for improvements. If approved, it would also become the largest bond in the history of the state of Texas. Major supporters of the bond, such as the Houston Food Bank, the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Houston, Mental Health America of Greater Houston, and Children at Risk, have valid concerns. They are particularly focused on the challenges faced by students in deteriorating school facilities.
However, there might be a glaring oversight in their assessment – the ability of HISD’s current leadership to effectively manage this initiative. Since assuming the role of Superintendent of the Houston Independent School District in June of 2023, Mike Miles has consistently been making headlines, albeit for all the wrong reasons. Despite his responsibilities in organizing, leading, directing, policy-making, and execution, Miles has failed to pass every test required to excel in his position. He has consistently struggled to lead this school district. Teachers are feeling distressed and uncertain about their roles, parents are worried about their children’s future, and students are losing interest in their education. The situation at HISD is dire, and it is clear that a change in leadership may be necessary to restore trust and stability within the district.
It is not surprising that former Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner and other local leaders who oppose the bond have expressed concerns regarding this proposal. They criticized Miles and his administration for not seeking sufficient input in developing the bond proposal. Bishop James Dixon, who heads the local National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) chapter, also criticized the lack of transparency in the bond proposal process. The Harris County Democratic Party Executive Committee voted unanimously to oppose it. Their party Chair Mike Doyle suggested that the funds should be in the hands of an elected representative, not Miles.
These criticisms underscore the critical need for transparency and community involvement in decision-making processes, particularly when it comes to allocating public funds. Superintendent Miles failed to actively engage all stakeholders, including community members and organizations, to ensure that the needs and priorities of the people were adequately addressed. The opposition ultimately stems from a lack of trust. Many believe that Miles cannot be trusted to responsibly manage billions in taxpayer money.
In less than two weeks, voters will see HISD’s bond divided into two items on their ballots, one totaling approximately $4 billion and the other around $400 million. Voters must carefully consider the implications of passing such a large bond, especially when there are concerns about the leadership within HISD. Judge Hidalgo and other supporters of this bond must move beyond their emotions. It is widely recognized that HISD is facing challenges and requires assistance. Ultimately, the success of this bond will depend on not just the amount of funding allocated, but also on the ability of HISD’s leadership to effectively implement and oversee its use.
♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, PhD, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015) and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us
- Champion for the Hungry: The Legacy of Congressman Mickey Leland - November 29, 2024
- Trump demands Republicans ‘kill’ bill that would protect journalists from government spying - November 22, 2024
- USCIS Simplifies the Path to U.S. Citizenship for Long-Term Permanent Residents - November 22, 2024
The ongoing feud between Houston Mayor John Whitmire and the city’s chief financial officer, Controller Chris Hollins, is escalating into a distracting political spectacle.
During a heated press conference last week, Whitmire accused Hollins of engaging in pay-to-play by seeking sponsorships for a local annual investor conference. Whitmire’s main concern is that Hollins openly sought sponsorships reaching up to $100,000, with top sponsors being promised access to a private dinner with him, as stated in a document on the city’s website. Whitmire announced that he had launched an ethics investigation into the matter.
The ongoing feud between Houston Mayor John Whitmire and the city’s chief financial officer, Controller Chris Hollins, is escalating into a distracting political spectacle.
During a heated press conference last week, Whitmire accused Hollins of engaging in pay-to-play by seeking sponsorships for a local annual investor conference. Whitmire’s main concern is that Hollins openly sought sponsorships reaching up to $100,000, with top sponsors being promised access to a private dinner with him, as stated in a document on the city’s website. Whitmire announced that he had launched an ethics investigation into the matter.
In response, Hollins swiftly retaliated by submitting a memo to the City of Houston’s Office of Inspector General and the Houston City Council Ethics Committee, requesting that the investigation be expanded to include fundraising practices for the Mayor’s State of the City event. Hollins defended his actions by explaining that he utilized the same fundraising model for the Investor Conference that the Mayor had used for the State of the City event. The key difference is that the Mayor controls the proceeds from the State of the City, while proceeds from the Investor Conference are directed to a non-profit donor-advised fund, where an independent body has exclusive spending authority.
The two men have publicly disagreed over the city’s finances, but the latest drama marked a new level of animosity. Earlier this year, for instance, the duo clashed over Whitmire’s proposed $1.5 billion settlement with the firefighter’s union. Tensions escalated when Hollins halted the process and raised additional questions about the agreement. Hollins also argued that the Mayor did not provide him with enough time to assess the financial impact the contract would have on the city’s finances. In response, Whitmire, who played a significant role in negotiating the settlement, emphasized the need for swift approval to prevent any potential legal challenges that could result in the city being liable for a larger sum than agreed upon.
However, this recent clash with Hollins is just the tip of the iceberg. Since taking office as Houston’s mayor, Whitmire has frequently made headlines for his conflicts with other public officials, many of whom are fellow members of his Democratic Party.
Do you remember the Whitmire versus Hidalgo drama? Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo supported the late Sheila Jackson Lee, Whitmire’s rival in a contentious mayoral race. Since Whitmire won and took office, his attitude towards Hidalgo and others who supported Jackson Lee has been quite vindictive. Whitmire has made it nearly impossible to meet with Hidalgo in person, even during major weather events that have hit Houston.
The officials had held separate briefings due to this ongoing discord. On May 16, they held their first joint news conference after an unexpected windstorm ravaged Houston. The exchange was disgraceful and awkward, with both even squabbling over who should speak at the podium. Whitmire remarked, “I’m glad I made the approval list,” to which Hidalgo responded, “Mayor, this is a disaster. Now is not the time.”
That was not the end of it. A month later, Whitmire stirred controversy with a derogatory comment on Hidalgo’s Facebook page regarding her bridal shower. Hidalgo had posted photos from the event, including one with her fiancé David James. Commenting from his official Facebook page, Whitmire wrote, “Wonderful. He sure looks like a nerd.” Whitmire’s comment generated awkward headlines and distractions from important policy matters for another week.
It is concerning that Whitmire has consistently found himself embroiled in controversies, yet appears unfazed by the backlash. In June, he sparked yet another contentious moment by stating to a news outlet that residents of Gulfton in Houston are predominantly undocumented immigrants seeking basic services and may not be welcomed in the Galleria. This comment prompted numerous local organizations to unite in signing and sending a letter demanding an apology for remarks they deemed highly offensive.
One significant concern with electing individuals of advanced age or nearing retirement to key political positions is that they often realize they have no long-term career to safeguard. This can ultimately result in a lack of decorum within the decision-making process, as these individuals prioritize their own agendas over the needs of those they are meant to serve. In the long run, this shortsighted approach can have detrimental effects on the overall stability and prosperity of the constituency.
The approach taken by Mayor John Whitmire aligns well with the above analogy. At 75 years old, he has essentially reached the conclusion of his illustrious political career. Yet as his ongoing political dramas continue to captivate public attention, one cannot help but question his capacity to organize people. His behavior has become a major topic in the media, diverting attention from his official duties and raising concerns about his ability to work effectively with officials who would not agree with him. Ultimately, it is up to Whitmire to address these issues.
♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, PhD, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015) and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us
- Champion for the Hungry: The Legacy of Congressman Mickey Leland - November 29, 2024
- Trump demands Republicans ‘kill’ bill that would protect journalists from government spying - November 22, 2024
- USCIS Simplifies the Path to U.S. Citizenship for Long-Term Permanent Residents - November 22, 2024
“Sore loser vengefully continues to navigate the murky waters of Harris County politics“ —Anthony Ogbo
In politics, wonders never cease. Just when you think you have seen it all, a new trend, scandal, or controversy emerges to shake up the terrain. Thus, politics remains an unpredictable strange environment where alliances shift, loyalties are tested, and power dynamics constantly evolve. Where am I going with this?
The U.S. Senate race between Republican Senator Ted Cruz and Democratic challenger Congressman Colin Allred is heating up in the final moments of the campaign. Cruz is up for re-election for the first time since narrowly winning a hard-fought challenge against Democrat Beto O’Rourke six years ago. But last month, Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, a prominent Democrat, made headlines for endorsing Cruz in his re-election campaign. Ogg’s support for Cruz was further highlighted in a recent advertisement airing in various regions of Texas, urging widespread backing for the senator.
In the advertisement, Ogg expressed her endorsement of Cruz, emphasizing the importance of bipartisan cooperation in addressing the challenges facing Texans. She stressed the need to ensure the safety of the state, mentioning Cruz’s proposed legislation to keep violent illegal immigrants in custody until their trial. Ogg further stated that she was voting for Cruz because of his commitment to keeping Texans safe.
Ogg, it may be recalled, was shamelessly unseated by Sean Teare, a former prosecutor in her own office. Teare had the backing of a group of Harris County Democratic Party precinct chairs unhappy with Ogg for inadequately representing party values. So, it was no surprise to those closely following Texas politics that she made those awful but strategic political decisions.
Since the Democrats rejected her reelection bid during the Party’s primary race in March, she has undergone a significantly bizarre political transformation, totally distancing herself from her Party and aligning more closely with conservative values. She completely changed her stance on various policy issues, including adopting tough-on-crime policies to gain favor with supposedly her former Republican adversaries.
Late last year, the ongoing feud between Ogg and her Party reached a boiling. The County Democrats voted 129 to 61 to admonish her for how she was doing her job. Party members accused her of weaponizing her office and falling out of step with Democratic values. The party created a resolution of admonishment that listed more than a dozen abuses but mainly accused her of abusing her power to pursue vendettas against political opponents.
Known for her vindictive conduct, Ogg has used her position to target political opponents with burdensome court cases, effectively punishing them for daring to challenge her authority. In a revealing interview with the Houston Chronicle in mid-September, a county court-at-law judge disclosed that he had cautioned his colleagues against crossing Ogg, stating, “If you anger her, you could find yourself facing a grand jury and potential indictment.”
In 2022, Ogg made headlines by indicting three former staffers of Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo, a progressive leader overseeing the local Commissioners Court, for allegedly directing $11 million in COVID-19 vaccine outreach funds to a politically connected vendor. The case has since stalled, with Hidalgo vehemently denying the accusations and no trial date set.
Ogg’s journey to becoming district attorney has been marked by controversy. Initially a Republican, she switched parties in 2016 and campaigned as a Democrat, pledging to reform the flawed cash bail system, decriminalize drug offenses, and establish a fairer justice system that does not oppress the less fortunate. However, Ogg’s stewardship began to raise eyebrows, as she accepted substantial campaign contributions from the local bail bond industry while accusing progressives of attempting to defund her department.
In a further display of her contentious approach, Ogg sought to have a self-proclaimed democratic socialist judge ousted from his position due to his outspoken criticism of the criminal justice system and reluctance to agree to plea bargains that often result in the unjust incarceration of low-income individuals. Additionally, following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Ogg declared her intention to prosecute individuals who violate Republican Governor Greg Abbott’s stringent ban on abortion on a case-by-case basis, aligning herself with one of the most restrictive abortion policies in the nation.
In no uncertain terms, Ogg remains a disgruntled witch in the current electoral season, vindictively prowling for a pound of flesh. Her latest shift in political ideology remains an unpredictable omen. Some speculate that she may be positioning herself to run as a Republican candidate in the upcoming elections while others believe she is simply trying to distance herself from the party that just turned her away.
Regardless of her motives, one thing is clear: Kim Ogg’s actions have left a trail of confusion and distrust among both her supporters and critics. Her willingness to flip-flop on key issues and align herself with different political parties only adds to the skepticism surrounding her true intentions. As this sore loser vengefully continues to navigate the murky waters of Harris County politics, one can only wonder what other surprises she has in store for the future.
♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, PhD, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015) and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us
- Champion for the Hungry: The Legacy of Congressman Mickey Leland - November 29, 2024
- Trump demands Republicans ‘kill’ bill that would protect journalists from government spying - November 22, 2024
- USCIS Simplifies the Path to U.S. Citizenship for Long-Term Permanent Residents - November 22, 2024
-
Column1 week agoChampion for the Hungry: The Legacy of Congressman Mickey Leland
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago11-year-old Nigerian student leads $11.5M initiative in Connecticut schools
-
African American2 weeks ago‘Malcolm X Daughters’ sue CIA, FBI, NYPD over their Dad’s Assassination
-
Lifestyle2 weeks agoUnited States: The Time You Must Be Married to Be Considered an American Citizen
-
News2 weeks agoUSCIS Simplifies the Path to U.S. Citizenship for Long-Term Permanent Residents
-
News2 weeks agoHaitian immigrants flee Springfield, Ohio, in droves after Trump election win
-
News2 weeks agoTrump demands Republicans ‘kill’ bill that would protect journalists from government spying
-
African American2 weeks agoAFROTECH™ 2024 — NAACP President Derrick Johnson Shares Special Reflections
