Connect with us

Column

Empowering Productivity: The Role of Authentic Tech Governance in Resource Control Values

Published

on

Effective tech governance in organizations and governments is essential for driving productivity and achieving desired outcomes. By aligning technology initiatives with strategic goals, managing risks, engaging stakeholders, measuring performance, ensuring compliance, developing talent, and promoting continuous improvement, organizations can harness the power of technology to enhance productivity and create a competitive advantage. In this context, authentic calls for tech governance are critical to ensure that technology is leveraged responsibly and effectively to support resource control values and overall robust productivity.

In recent years, the rapid advancement of technology has posed new challenges for democracies around the world. Issues such as data protection, privacy, and the regulation of tech giants have become major points of contention. In response to these challenges, many governments have begun to implement tech governance measures to ensure that technology is used responsibly and ethically.
Tech governance refers to the processes by which governments, businesses, and other organizations make decisions about the development and use of technology. This includes setting regulations, standards, and guidelines to ensure that technology is used in a way that benefits society as a whole. Tech governance also involves promoting transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in the development and deployment of technology.
Resource control, on the other hand, refers to the ability of governments to regulate and manage the use of resources, including natural resources, data, and infrastructure. With the increasing reliance on technology in all aspects of society, resource control has become a key factor in ensuring that technology is used in a way that is sustainable and equitable. This includes enforcing regulations on data privacy, ensuring fair competition in the tech industry, and protecting vulnerable communities from the negative impacts of technology.
In a democracy, tech governance and resource control are essential for protecting the rights and interests of citizens. By implementing rules and regulations that govern the use of technology, governments can ensure that technology is used in a way that promotes democracy, transparency, and social justice. Additionally, by controlling access to and use of resources, governments can prevent the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a few, and ensure that technology benefits society as a whole.
Overall, the rise of tech governance and resource control in democracy is a positive development that reflects the growing recognition of the importance of technology in shaping our society. By implementing responsible and ethical practices in the development and use of technology, governments can help ensure that technology serves the greater good and contributes to a more equitable and sustainable future.
In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, harnessing the power of effective AI and cybersecurity is essential for organizations looking to thrive in a competitive market. By implementing robust tech governance practices, companies can not only enhance their productivity but also strengthen their resource control values. In this regard, incorporating real-world examples can serve as a valuable guide in maximizing the potential of technology for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage.
Effective use of AI and cybersecurity in technology governance can provide a competitive advantage for resource control values by improving efficiency, increasing security, and ensuring compliance with regulations. Here are some examples of how AI and cybersecurity can be leveraged to enhance resource control values in governance:
1. Predictive analytics: AI can analyze large datasets to predict trends and patterns, helping governments and organizations make informed decisions about the allocation of resources. For example, AI-powered predictive analytics can help identify potential risks and opportunities in resource management, allowing for more effective planning and utilization of resources.
2. Automated threat detection: Cybersecurity tools powered by AI can continuously monitor and analyze network traffic to quickly detect and respond to cyber threats. By proactively identifying and mitigating security risks, AI-driven cybersecurity measures can help protect critical resources and infrastructure from cyber-attacks.
3. Compliance monitoring: AI can be used to automate compliance checks and audits, ensuring that regulations and policies related to resource control are consistently enforced. AI-powered compliance monitoring tools can help identify any violations or discrepancies, enabling prompt corrective action to be taken to uphold resource control values.
4. Blockchain technology: Blockchain, a secure and transparent decentralized ledger, can be leveraged to enhance resource control values by ensuring data integrity and traceability. For example, blockchain can be used to create tamper-proof records of transactions related to the allocation and use of resources, providing a verifiable audit trail for accountability and transparency.
5. Cyber threat intelligence: AI can be used to analyze and interpret cybersecurity threat intelligence data to proactively identify potential threats to critical resources. By leveraging AI-driven threat intelligence, governments and organizations can stay one step ahead of adversaries and strengthen their defences against cyber attacks.
By effectively integrating AI and cybersecurity into technology governance practices, governments and organizations can create a competitive advantage for resource control values by enhancing efficiency, security, and compliance. This, in turn, can contribute to building a more resilient and sustainable governance framework that fosters innovation, transparency, and trust in the management of resources.
In the modern era of rapid technological advancement, there is a growing imperative for authentic calls to be made for tech governance to achieve overall robust productivity. As organizations navigate the complexities of the digital landscape, it is crucial to establish comprehensive guidelines and frameworks that govern the use of technology resources effectively. By prioritizing tech governance, companies can not only streamline their operations but also optimize their overall productivity and performance.
Authentic calls for tech governance are essential in achieving overall robust productivity in organizations and governments. Here are some key considerations for effective tech governance to drive productivity:
1. Strategic alignment: Tech governance should be aligned with the organization’s overall strategic goals and objectives. It is essential to ensure that technology investments and initiatives are in line with the organization’s vision and mission to drive productivity and achieve desired outcomes.
2. Risk management: Tech governance should include robust risk management practices to identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks associated with technology implementation. By proactively addressing risks, organizations can safeguard their operations and enhance productivity.
3. Stakeholder engagement: Tech governance should involve collaboration and communication with key stakeholders, including employees, customers, and partners. Engaging stakeholders in decision-making processes and seeking their feedback can help ensure that technology initiatives meet their needs and contribute to increased productivity.
4. Performance measurement: Tech governance should include mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating the performance of technology investments and projects. By setting clear performance metrics and tracking progress, organizations can assess the impact of technology on productivity and make informed decisions to drive continuous improvement.
5. Compliance and ethics: Tech governance should prioritize compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards. Adhering to data privacy and security requirements, as well as promoting responsible use of technology, is essential to maintain trust and integrity in tech governance practices.
6. Talent development: Tech governance should prioritize talent development and capacity building to ensure that employees have the necessary skills and knowledge to leverage technology effectively. Investing in training and development programs can help enhance productivity and drive innovation within the organization.
7. Continuous improvement: Tech governance should be dynamic and adaptable to changing technology trends and business needs. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement and innovation, organizations can stay ahead of the curve and drive productivity through the strategic application of technology.
By embracing authentic calls for tech governance that prioritize strategic alignment, risk management, stakeholder engagement, performance measurement, compliance, talent development, and continuous improvement, organizations can achieve overall robust productivity and maximize the benefits of technology investments.
In conclusion, authentic calls for tech governance play a crucial role in achieving overall robust productivity in organizations and governments. By implementing effective tech governance practices that prioritize strategic alignment, risk management, stakeholder engagement, performance measurement, compliance, talent development, and continuous improvement, organizations can drive productivity, innovation, and competitiveness. Organizations must embrace tech governance as a strategic imperative and proactively address the challenges and opportunities presented by technology to achieve sustainable growth and success. By making authentic calls for tech governance, organizations can maximize the benefits of technology investments and create a culture of accountability, transparency, and excellence in resource control values.

♦ Professor Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is a Nigerian Professor of Cyber Security and Information Technology Management, and holds a Chartered Manager Status, and by extension, Chartered Fellow (CMgr FCMI) by the highly Reputable Royal Chartered Management Institute.

Texas Guardian News

Anthony Obi Ogbo

Dunamis Digital Dilemma: Why Shutting Down Virtual Worship May Alienate a New Generation of Believers

Published

on

“Spirituality is no longer confined to physical sanctuaries” —Anthony Obi Ogbo

The demands of the digital and virtual age, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, are both undeniable and irreversible. The pandemic didn’t merely disrupt norms—it reshaped them. From global commerce to education and religious observance, the shift to digital platforms is now a defining feature of contemporary life. The surge in e-commerce has revolutionized how consumers behave, compelling organizations to reinvent their digital presence through social media, targeted marketing, and immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality.

Yet, while many institutions have adapted to these realities, some remain entrenched in pre-pandemic mindsets. One recent example is the Dunamis International Gospel Centre in Abuja, Nigeria, under the leadership of Pastor Paul Enenche. The church announced the suspension of its live-streamed services, citing the biblical imperative for believers to gather physically, as referenced in Hebrews 10:25.

While the theological rationale was emphasized, the practical implications—particularly financial—were conspicuously understated. Churches around the world have successfully embraced virtual platforms not just to foster spiritual connection but also to maintain financial stability through online giving systems. In contrast, Dunamis’s move appears to prioritize physical attendance at the expense of accessibility and inclusivity.

In today’s digitally integrated society, suspending virtual worship risks alienating many who have come to rely on these platforms. Individuals with health challenges, mobility issues, or who live far from church facilities depend on livestreams to remain spiritually connected. More importantly, younger generations increasingly seek faith experiences that mirror their digital-first realities—flexible, inclusive, and globally accessible. By disregarding these expectations, churches may unintentionally push away the very audiences they aim to engage.

Pastor Enenche’s decision, while perhaps grounded in spiritual intent, may prove counterproductive in practice. The younger demographic—tech-savvy, mobile, and globally aware—now expects more from institutions of faith. They are turning toward worship centers that treat digital engagement not as an afterthought but as a vital dimension of spiritual life. The hybrid church model—integrating both in-person and online elements—has emerged as a powerful strategy for expanding reach while honoring traditional values. It allows churches to be both rooted and relevant.

The decision to suspend livestreaming church services reflects a deeper tension between tradition and innovation, between preserving ritual and adapting to contemporary realities. Faith institutions today are not just places of worship; they are also cultural anchors navigating an increasingly digital society. Ignoring this evolution risks rendering the church irrelevant to a generation that lives, works, and worships online. Spirituality is no longer confined to physical sanctuaries—it’s present in podcast sermons, Zoom prayer meetings, WhatsApp devotionals, and YouTube gospel concerts.

Virtual engagement is not a dilution of faith; it is an extension of it. It makes the message of hope and redemption accessible across boundaries of geography, ability, and circumstance. The pandemic revealed this, but the future will demand it. Churches that fail to embrace digital tools risk becoming spiritual silos—isolated, inflexible, and out of touch with modern believers.

Leadership in ministry, like leadership in any other sphere, must evolve with the people it seeks to serve. Pastor Enenche and others in similar positions should not view digital transformation as a threat but as an opportunity—an opportunity to reach farther, touch deeper, and uplift more lives. The gospel, after all, is meant for all—and now, more than ever, everywhere.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Continue Reading

Column

A President in Isolation: Why Nigeria Must Step Beyond France

Published

on

A man in distress nurses no pride. He goes wherever and to whomever necessary in search of help.

Earlier this year, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky made the long journey to the White House. There, he endured the discomfort of facing a skeptical audience and navigating tense optics in the Oval Office. But his country is at war with the ruthless Russian bear—it was a matter of survival. Zelensky took the bruises for the sake of his people and his presidency.

Similarly, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa defied the odds of a strained relationship with the United States under President Trump. He walked into the lion’s den, candidly stating, “We don’t have a jetliner to give.” He needed to mend a diplomatic fence buckling under the weight of American pressure. Ramaphosa swallowed the bitter pill for his country and for the office he holds.

Even former U.S. President Donald Trump, despite his bluster, flew to the Middle East with a wishlist. He returned with a super-luxury jet courtesy of the wealthy Qataris. Even rich nations, it seems, have urgent needs.

So, what does Nigeria need? And when will Nigeria’s president take the initiative to visit Washington and other world capitals in search of strategic support? Must we wait until the roof collapses before we seek shelter? Why does Nigeria’s presidential travel itinerary always end in Paris? What enduring value lies in aligning almost exclusively with a former colonial power still tethered to the resources of its former African territories?

If I were President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, I would have visited the United States months ago. I would have met with President Trump to express how Nigeria is hemorrhaging talent, losing its brightest minds and most skilled professionals to America. I would appeal for a mutually beneficial arrangement: support Nigeria in making home viable, so fewer of our people are forced to migrate.

Given Trump’s well-known anti-immigration stance—and his business-oriented mindset—a development-based partnership could prove attractive. He might even call it, “the best deal ever.”

I would emphasize the immense value Nigerian professionals bring to the U.S. economy—our doctors, nurses, engineers, and tech innovators. I would remind him of Phillip Emeagwali, whose work helped lay the groundwork for the internet, the very infrastructure that fuels today’s global economy.

I would also point to the tax contributions of Nigerians in the U.S. and underscore the fact that we are assets—not burdens—wherever we go.

While in America, I would convene a high-profile forum with Nigerian professionals in healthcare and tech. I would solicit their ideas on how to strengthen Nigeria’s systems. That meeting would showcase Nigeria’s human capital and raise respect for our contributions to the American success story.

To complement this strategy, I would travel with cultural ambassadors like Davido, Flavour, and Burna Boy—creative powerhouses who have propelled Nigerian music to global acclaim. Their presence would not only be a nod of recognition but also a marketing masterstroke to elevate Nigeria’s cultural diplomacy.

This is how to lead a nation of over 200 million energetic, talented people. This is how to harness excellence—wherever it may reside. Yet today, President Tinubu appears to be operating in a vacuum.

The United States offers vast opportunities for trade, collaboration, and growth. Ignoring such a relationship is not just short-sighted—it is counterproductive. The same logic applies to engaging other global powerhouses like China, India, and Brazil.

A “Renewed Hope” agenda without a practical roadmap for international economic cooperation is like dreaming of a sumptuous pot of soup in your sleep—you wake up hungry, but empty-handed. Only those willing to go to the market and cook will ever taste that dream.

♦ Dominic Ikeogu is a social and political commentator based in Minneapolis, USA.

Texas Guardian News
Continue Reading

Anthony Obi Ogbo

The Novice Advantage: Rethinking Graduate Readiness in a Demanding Job Market

Published

on

“Employers aren’t just filling vacancies—they’re investing in solutions” —Anthony Obi Ogbo

Long before graduation, I understood that success in the job market required more than just a degree. Throughout college, I committed to internships, apprenticeships, and vacation jobs—some unpaid—solely to build the kind of professional experience that would ease my transition into the workforce. By the time I completed my NYSC at The Nigerian Guardian, I wasn’t just another fresh graduate—I was a candidate with proof of performance. I was retained on merit and even offered two cartoon columns at Guardian Express in a separate contract. That preparation made all the difference.

Today, however, many college graduates enter the job market unequipped for its demands. They speak of rejection, frustration, and a lack of experience—all valid concerns in an economy where employers no longer train novice hires from scratch. In a hyper-competitive, fast-paced, and increasingly skills-based market, the burden of preparation rests squarely on the students themselves.

There was a time when being a “novice” came with room to grow. Employers saw potential and invested in it. Now, entry-level roles often come with mid-level expectations: practical skills, strategic thinking, and an ability to contribute from day one. Employers aren’t just filling vacancies—they’re investing in solutions.

This is why it’s crucial for students to begin preparing early. That means building portfolios, seeking field-relevant internships, volunteering in areas that sharpen communication and leadership, and using every academic project as a springboard for real-world insight. These experiences add depth to a résumé and provide talking points in interviews that distinguish candidates from the crowd.

Equally important is networking. The relationships students build—with mentors, professionals, or peers—often become the very bridges that connect them to employment opportunities.

Ultimately, preparing for employment as a college student isn’t optional—it’s essential. And the sooner students begin, the better their chances of entering the workforce with confidence, clarity, and competence.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Continue Reading

Trending