Connect with us

Column

Empowering Productivity: The Role of Authentic Tech Governance in Resource Control Values

Published

2 months ago

on

Effective tech governance in organizations and governments is essential for driving productivity and achieving desired outcomes. By aligning technology initiatives with strategic goals, managing risks, engaging stakeholders, measuring performance, ensuring compliance, developing talent, and promoting continuous improvement, organizations can harness the power of technology to enhance productivity and create a competitive advantage. In this context, authentic calls for tech governance are critical to ensure that technology is leveraged responsibly and effectively to support resource control values and overall robust productivity.

In recent years, the rapid advancement of technology has posed new challenges for democracies around the world. Issues such as data protection, privacy, and the regulation of tech giants have become major points of contention. In response to these challenges, many governments have begun to implement tech governance measures to ensure that technology is used responsibly and ethically.
Tech governance refers to the processes by which governments, businesses, and other organizations make decisions about the development and use of technology. This includes setting regulations, standards, and guidelines to ensure that technology is used in a way that benefits society as a whole. Tech governance also involves promoting transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in the development and deployment of technology.
Resource control, on the other hand, refers to the ability of governments to regulate and manage the use of resources, including natural resources, data, and infrastructure. With the increasing reliance on technology in all aspects of society, resource control has become a key factor in ensuring that technology is used in a way that is sustainable and equitable. This includes enforcing regulations on data privacy, ensuring fair competition in the tech industry, and protecting vulnerable communities from the negative impacts of technology.
In a democracy, tech governance and resource control are essential for protecting the rights and interests of citizens. By implementing rules and regulations that govern the use of technology, governments can ensure that technology is used in a way that promotes democracy, transparency, and social justice. Additionally, by controlling access to and use of resources, governments can prevent the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a few, and ensure that technology benefits society as a whole.
Overall, the rise of tech governance and resource control in democracy is a positive development that reflects the growing recognition of the importance of technology in shaping our society. By implementing responsible and ethical practices in the development and use of technology, governments can help ensure that technology serves the greater good and contributes to a more equitable and sustainable future.
In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, harnessing the power of effective AI and cybersecurity is essential for organizations looking to thrive in a competitive market. By implementing robust tech governance practices, companies can not only enhance their productivity but also strengthen their resource control values. In this regard, incorporating real-world examples can serve as a valuable guide in maximizing the potential of technology for achieving a sustainable competitive advantage.
Effective use of AI and cybersecurity in technology governance can provide a competitive advantage for resource control values by improving efficiency, increasing security, and ensuring compliance with regulations. Here are some examples of how AI and cybersecurity can be leveraged to enhance resource control values in governance:
1. Predictive analytics: AI can analyze large datasets to predict trends and patterns, helping governments and organizations make informed decisions about the allocation of resources. For example, AI-powered predictive analytics can help identify potential risks and opportunities in resource management, allowing for more effective planning and utilization of resources.
2. Automated threat detection: Cybersecurity tools powered by AI can continuously monitor and analyze network traffic to quickly detect and respond to cyber threats. By proactively identifying and mitigating security risks, AI-driven cybersecurity measures can help protect critical resources and infrastructure from cyber-attacks.
3. Compliance monitoring: AI can be used to automate compliance checks and audits, ensuring that regulations and policies related to resource control are consistently enforced. AI-powered compliance monitoring tools can help identify any violations or discrepancies, enabling prompt corrective action to be taken to uphold resource control values.
4. Blockchain technology: Blockchain, a secure and transparent decentralized ledger, can be leveraged to enhance resource control values by ensuring data integrity and traceability. For example, blockchain can be used to create tamper-proof records of transactions related to the allocation and use of resources, providing a verifiable audit trail for accountability and transparency.
5. Cyber threat intelligence: AI can be used to analyze and interpret cybersecurity threat intelligence data to proactively identify potential threats to critical resources. By leveraging AI-driven threat intelligence, governments and organizations can stay one step ahead of adversaries and strengthen their defences against cyber attacks.
By effectively integrating AI and cybersecurity into technology governance practices, governments and organizations can create a competitive advantage for resource control values by enhancing efficiency, security, and compliance. This, in turn, can contribute to building a more resilient and sustainable governance framework that fosters innovation, transparency, and trust in the management of resources.
In the modern era of rapid technological advancement, there is a growing imperative for authentic calls to be made for tech governance to achieve overall robust productivity. As organizations navigate the complexities of the digital landscape, it is crucial to establish comprehensive guidelines and frameworks that govern the use of technology resources effectively. By prioritizing tech governance, companies can not only streamline their operations but also optimize their overall productivity and performance.
Authentic calls for tech governance are essential in achieving overall robust productivity in organizations and governments. Here are some key considerations for effective tech governance to drive productivity:
1. Strategic alignment: Tech governance should be aligned with the organization’s overall strategic goals and objectives. It is essential to ensure that technology investments and initiatives are in line with the organization’s vision and mission to drive productivity and achieve desired outcomes.
2. Risk management: Tech governance should include robust risk management practices to identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks associated with technology implementation. By proactively addressing risks, organizations can safeguard their operations and enhance productivity.
3. Stakeholder engagement: Tech governance should involve collaboration and communication with key stakeholders, including employees, customers, and partners. Engaging stakeholders in decision-making processes and seeking their feedback can help ensure that technology initiatives meet their needs and contribute to increased productivity.
4. Performance measurement: Tech governance should include mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating the performance of technology investments and projects. By setting clear performance metrics and tracking progress, organizations can assess the impact of technology on productivity and make informed decisions to drive continuous improvement.
5. Compliance and ethics: Tech governance should prioritize compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards. Adhering to data privacy and security requirements, as well as promoting responsible use of technology, is essential to maintain trust and integrity in tech governance practices.
6. Talent development: Tech governance should prioritize talent development and capacity building to ensure that employees have the necessary skills and knowledge to leverage technology effectively. Investing in training and development programs can help enhance productivity and drive innovation within the organization.
7. Continuous improvement: Tech governance should be dynamic and adaptable to changing technology trends and business needs. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement and innovation, organizations can stay ahead of the curve and drive productivity through the strategic application of technology.
By embracing authentic calls for tech governance that prioritize strategic alignment, risk management, stakeholder engagement, performance measurement, compliance, talent development, and continuous improvement, organizations can achieve overall robust productivity and maximize the benefits of technology investments.
In conclusion, authentic calls for tech governance play a crucial role in achieving overall robust productivity in organizations and governments. By implementing effective tech governance practices that prioritize strategic alignment, risk management, stakeholder engagement, performance measurement, compliance, talent development, and continuous improvement, organizations can drive productivity, innovation, and competitiveness. Organizations must embrace tech governance as a strategic imperative and proactively address the challenges and opportunities presented by technology to achieve sustainable growth and success. By making authentic calls for tech governance, organizations can maximize the benefits of technology investments and create a culture of accountability, transparency, and excellence in resource control values.

♦ Professor Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is a Nigerian Professor of Cyber Security and Information Technology Management, and holds a Chartered Manager Status, and by extension, Chartered Fellow (CMgr FCMI) by the highly Reputable Royal Chartered Management Institute.

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Column

Advocating for Reviving the 1960s Constitution Toward Creating a United Region of Nigeria

Published

2 days ago

on

July 25, 2024

By

As Nigeria stands at a critical juncture in its national development, the administration under President Bola Tinubu has already made strides in addressing the country’s challenges and opportunities. Amidst calls for constitutional restructuring and regional autonomy, the proposal to revive the 1960s Constitution and form the United Region of Nigeria has emerged as a potential strategy for nation-building. This ambitious vision aims to foster greater unity, cooperation, and development among Nigeria’s diverse regions, drawing inspiration from the country’s historical foundations. In this context, the Tinubu administration can play a pivotal role in bringing this strategy to fruition and shaping a more inclusive and prosperous future for the nation.

Reviving the 1960s Constitution in developing Nigeria for the present and future is a bold and forward-thinking move. The Constitution of the 1960s was a document that sought to promote unity and diversity within the country and to ensure that the rights and freedoms of all Nigerians were protected. By reviving this Constitution, we can build on the foundation of unity and inclusivity that it provided, and adapt it to meet the challenges and opportunities of the modern world.
One of the key proposals for reviving the 1960s Constitution is the national forming of the country into the United Region of Nigeria. This proposal would involve reorganizing the country into a more cohesive and integrated entity, where different regions or states would have more autonomy and decision-making power, while still remaining united under a common framework. This would help to address some of the deep-rooted issues of marginalization, inequality, and ethnic tensions that have plagued the country for decades.
By forming the United Region of Nigeria, we can create a more equitable and inclusive society, where the different regions and ethnic groups feel a sense of ownership and participation in the development of the country. This could help to bridge the divide between the different regions and promote a sense of national unity and cohesion.
Furthermore, reviving the 1960s Constitution and forming the United Region of Nigeria could have a significant impact on the delivery of holistic dividends of democracy to all Nigerians. By decentralizing power and decision-making, we can ensure that the voices and needs of all Nigerians are heard and respected. This could lead to better governance, improved service delivery, and greater accountability from leaders at all levels.
Essentially, reviving the 1960s Constitution and forming the United Region of Nigeria is a proactive step towards building a better and more inclusive society for all Nigerians. By embracing the principles of unity, diversity, and decentralization, we can create a more cohesive and progressive nation that works for the benefit of all its citizens.
Intriguingly, advocating for the revival of the 1960s Constitution, the creation of a United Region of Nigeria, and the implementation of advanced nation-building strategies present a significant opportunity for economic well-being and value creation for all Nigerians. By revisiting the foundational principles of the 1960s Constitution, we can harness the strengths of our diverse regions and promote unity and cooperation. This approach can foster economic growth, attract investment, and create job opportunities for citizens across the country. Additionally, by embracing advanced nation-building strategies, we can build a more resilient and inclusive society that values innovation, education, and sustainable development, ultimately leading to improved living standards and prosperity for all Nigerians.
The economic well-being of reviving the 1960s Constitution and forming the United Region of Nigeria could be significant. By decentralizing power and decision-making, this proposal could create opportunities for economic growth and development at the regional level, which in turn could benefit the entire nation.
One of the key ways in which this proposal could enhance economic well-being is by promoting regional competitiveness and resource utilization. Each region in Nigeria has unique strengths and resources that could be harnessed for economic development. By giving regions more autonomy and control over their resources, they can leverage these assets to attract investment, create jobs, and stimulate growth.
Furthermore, the formation of the United Region of Nigeria could lead to greater inter-regional trade and cooperation. By breaking down barriers between regions and fostering collaboration, we can create a more dynamic and interconnected economy that benefits all Nigerians. This could lead to increased productivity, efficiency, and innovation, driving economic growth and prosperity.
Additionally, decentralization of power could lead to better governance and more responsive policymaking, which are essential for creating a conducive environment for businesses to thrive. With improved governance and accountability, we can create a level playing field for all businesses, encourage entrepreneurship, and attract investment both locally and internationally.
In terms of value-creation opportunities for all Nigerians, the formation of the United Region of Nigeria could lead to greater inclusivity and participation in decision-making processes. By giving regions more autonomy and control over their affairs, we can ensure that the needs and aspirations of all Nigerians are taken into account in the policymaking process. This could lead to the creation of policies and programs that reflect the diversity and priorities of the population, promoting social cohesion and inclusive growth.
Overall, reviving the 1960s Constitution and forming the United Region of Nigeria has the potential to drive economic growth, enhance regional competitiveness, and create opportunities for all Nigerians to participate in and benefit from the development of the country. It is a bold and forward-thinking proposal that could pave the way for a more inclusive, prosperous, and united Nigeria.
Examining global examples of nations that have adopted similar national strategies can offer valuable insights into the potential economic well-being and value-creation opportunities for Nigeria. Countries like Germany and South Korea have successfully implemented nation-building strategies that prioritize innovation, education, and sustainable development. Germany’s emphasis on advanced manufacturing and technology sectors has propelled its economy to become one of the strongest in Europe. Similarly, South Korea’s focus on education and investment in technology has led to rapid economic growth and the emergence of global industry leaders. By analyzing the available data and lessons learned from these nations, Nigeria can tailor its own national strategy to leverage its unique strengths and resources for the benefit of all citizens.
Undoubtedly, there are indeed examples of countries around the world that have decentralized power and decision-making processes, leading to economic growth and benefits for their citizens. One example is Germany, which operates under a federal system of government. Germany is divided into states (Länder), each with its own government and legislative powers. This decentralization of power has allowed for regional autonomy, innovation, and economic development.
Germany’s federal system has enabled states to tailor policies to their specific needs and priorities, leading to diverse approaches to economic development, education, healthcare, and other areas. This flexibility has contributed to Germany’s overall economic success, with different regions driving growth in various sectors based on their strengths and resources.
Another example is Switzerland, which operates under a system of direct democracy and federalism. Switzerland is divided into cantons, each with a high degree of autonomy in areas such as taxation, education, and healthcare. This decentralized system has contributed to Switzerland’s economic prosperity, innovation, and social cohesion.
These examples demonstrate that decentralization of power and decision-making processes can lead to economic growth, innovation, and benefits for all citizens. By empowering regions and local governments to make decisions that are best suited to their specific needs and resources, countries can create more inclusive and sustainable development strategies that reflect the diversity of their populations.
While there may not be direct data available to support the specific proposal of reviving the 1960s Constitution and forming the United Region of Nigeria, these examples highlight the potential benefits of decentralization and regional autonomy in driving economic growth and value creation opportunities for all citizens.
To bring about the successful implementation of a national strategy focused on economic well-being and values creation for all Nigerians, the current administration under Tinubu can take specific actions. Firstly, investing in key sectors such as technology, agriculture, and infrastructure will not only drive economic growth but also create job opportunities and improve living standards for citizens. Additionally, prioritizing education and skills development programs can ensure that the workforce is equipped to participate in a rapidly evolving global economy. Strengthening governance, promoting transparency, and fighting corruption are crucial steps to attract foreign investment, build trust with international partners, and foster a conducive business environment. Collaboration with industry stakeholders, civil society, and the public will be essential in crafting policies that address the diverse needs of the population and ensure that the benefits of economic growth are shared equitably. By strategically implementing these measures, the Tinubu administration can pave the way for sustainable development and inclusive prosperity for all Nigerians.
For an immediate present and future attainments, Bola Tinubu’s administration could take the following steps to bring the proposed strategy of reviving the 1960s Constitution and forming the United Region of Nigeria to fruition as part of nation-building:
1. Constitutional Amendment: The administration could initiate a constitutional review process to amend the current constitution to reflect the proposed changes. This process would involve engaging with the National Assembly, state governments, and other relevant stakeholders to ensure broad support for the amendments.
2. Regional Integration: The administration could prioritize efforts to foster greater integration and cooperation among the regions of Nigeria. This could involve promoting economic partnerships, cultural exchanges, and collaborative projects to strengthen the bonds between different regions.
3. Resource Allocation: The administration could revisit the current system of resource allocation to ensure a fair distribution of resources among the regions. This could involve restructuring revenue-sharing arrangements and fiscal federalism to empower regional governments and promote local development.
4. Infrastructure Development: The administration could prioritize infrastructure development projects that connect different regions and enhance connectivity within the country. This could include investments in transportation networks, energy infrastructure, and digital connectivity to facilitate economic growth and social development.
5. Peacebuilding and Reconciliation: The administration could focus on addressing historical grievances and promoting reconciliation among different ethnic and regional groups in Nigeria. This could involve initiatives to promote dialogue, understanding, and healing to foster national unity and social cohesion.
In pursuing this strategy, the Tinubu administration would need to demonstrate strong leadership, effective governance, and a commitment to inclusive development. Building consensus, engaging with stakeholders, and promoting transparency and accountability would be essential for the success of these efforts.
In conclusion, the proposal to revive the 1960s Constitution and form the United Region of Nigeria represents a bold and transformative vision for the country’s future. As the Bola Tinubu administration continues its term, the implementation of this strategy requires a holistic approach that emphasizes constitutional reform, regional integration, resource allocation, infrastructure development, and peacebuilding. By fostering dialogue, building consensus, and demonstrating strong leadership, the administration can pave the way for a more united, prosperous, and harmonious Nigeria. As the nation embarks on this journey of nation-building, it is imperative to recognize the importance of inclusive governance, social cohesion, and sustainable development in shaping a brighter future for all Nigerians.

♦ Professor Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is a Nigerian Professor of Cyber Security and Information Technology Management, and holds a Chartered Manager Status, and by extension, Chartered Fellow (CMgr FCMI) by the highly Reputable Royal Chartered Management Institute.

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Anthony Obi Ogbo

Sylvester Turner Should Cancel His Bid for Late Jackson Lee’s Congressional Seat

Published

2 days ago

on

July 25, 2024

By

“Running an election alongside his mentees might be seen as a selfish but insatiable appetite for office.“ —Anthony Ogbo

Former Mayor Sylvester Turner has expressed serious interest in running for the late Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s congressional seat. In an interview with KHOU, Turner stated that the passing of his friend (Sheila) has prompted him to consider coming out of retirement for this critical opportunity. A decision from the former mayor is expected in the coming days.

74-year Jackson Lee, a prominent figure in Houston politics, passed away last week after revealing her battle with pancreatic cancer earlier this year. She had represented the 18th Congressional District since 1995, earning a reputation for her unwavering dedication and frequent presence at community events within the district.

Among other declared and potential Democratic candidates vying for Jackson Lee’s seat are state Rep. Jarvis Johnson, Houston Councilwoman Letitia Plummer, and Amanda Edwards, who placed second in the district’s original primary.

The news of Turner’s potential consideration for a congressional position has sparked surprise among Houstonians, particularly his community supporters. However, there is a noticeable silence surrounding the topic, with many engaging in hushed conversations and speculation. The mere idea of transitioning to a fast-paced congressional role raises concerns about the potential impact on the community and his supporters, who are unsure about his physical well-being.

At 69 years old, Turner is a seasoned attorney, activist, and politician who recently concluded a tumultuous 8-year term in office. But his departure in January was marked by health concerns. He had battled bone cancer in his jaw, undergoing surgery and six weeks of radiation therapy in 2022. This ailment not only forced him to cancel an official trip to France but also led to his absence from City Council meetings for several weeks.

There is currently a discussion surrounding the potential for Turner to assume a new role in Congress because his health issues cast doubt on his capacity to fulfill the responsibilities of this position. This has elicited a range of emotions among observers, with some expressing concern about his ability to effectively manage the demands of the role. Despite his experience and dedication to public service, concerns linger about his physical stability and capacity, to effectively represent constituents in a more demanding political arena.

Turner’s consideration to vie for Sheila Jackson Lee’s congressional seat also reveals a poignant irony. Jackson Lee tragically passed away while juggling the demands of her congressional responsibilities and battling a deadly form of cancer. Despite undergoing treatment for pancreatic cancer, she tirelessly worked to support her constituents during the aftermath of Hurricane Beryl. For over two weeks, Jackson Lee stood up for the thousands of individuals in her district who were left vulnerable without power.

Some members of the community believed that Jackson-Lee should have retired after her cancer diagnosis. However, her passing could serve as a lesson to other long-serving public officials who would neglect their health in pursuit of power and public service.

The impact of politics on physical, psychological, and social health is a reality that cannot be denied. Recently, President Joe Biden decided to withdraw from the 2024 presidential race after facing intense pressure, speculation, and internal turmoil within his own Democratic Party. Concerns about his health, both physical and cognitive, have been a constant focus in recent weeks, especially his lackluster performance at the June 27 presidential debate. This situation highlights the toll that politics can take on individuals at the highest levels of government.

Public officials need to prioritize their health and well-being, as neglecting it can have serious consequences. Serving the public is a noble calling, but it should not come at the expense of one’s own health. Jackson-Lee’s passing should remind all public servants of the importance of retirement. It serves as a sobering reminder that life is precious and unpredictable and that it is essential to prioritize self-care and well-being to enjoy a fulfilling retirement after years of dedicated service.

Ultimately, Jackson-Lee’s passing should inspire Turner to take proactive steps toward sustaining his happy and healthy retirement. He should reconsider his bid for Jackson Lee’s Congressional Seat. At this point in his career, it may be more beneficial for him to contemplate retirement and offer his support to other candidates who have long been supporters of his campaign during his political career. Running an election alongside those mentees might be seen as a selfish but insatiable appetite for office.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo,PhD, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Anthony Obi Ogbo

Was Trump’s Assassin unstoppable because he was White?

Published

1 week ago

on

July 17, 2024

By

“It is worth considering whether Trump’s assassin would have been treated differently if he were Black.“ —Anthony Ogbo

On Saturday, July 13, a gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, armed with an AR-15 assault rifle, brazenly carried his killer weapon to the rooftop from a short distance to the podium where the former President, Donald Trump was addressing a political rally. Unchallenged, he fired up to eight shots toward the stage, with one shot hitting Trump’s right ear. Tragically, one rally-goer died, and two others were critically injured before the assailant was taken down by a Secret Service sniper. The shooter was identified as white.

Just a few days later, on Tuesday, five Columbus police officers in Milwaukee shot and killed a homeless man outside the security perimeter of the Republican convention. The man was waving knives at others, and residents reported that he had been living in a tent. To be precise, this incident took place about 1 mile from the convention in a residential neighborhood that included a large homeless encampment. The homeless man was Black.

Since the incident involving Trump, investigators have been diligently working to determine the cause of the attack and prevent future occurrences. They have explored various theories and possibilities as they come to terms with how the individual was able to conveniently carry out such a heinous act.

Attendees at the event had alerted local police about the shooter heading towards the rooftop. However, authorities failed to communicate this information to security personnel, potentially jeopardizing the safety of the former President. A Homeland Security law enforcement memo revealed that the shooter had recently purchased ammunition, received hazardous material shipments, and had improvised explosive devices in his car and home.

It was also reported that before the would-be assassin aimed at Trump, attendees reported they saw him pacing and behaving strangely. Crooks was not shot, rather, local police officers began pursuing him on foot. During the pursuit, the U.S. official said, local police told the Secret Service they were looking for a suspicious person near the event. Furthermore, the U.S. official said the Secret Service was told of a suspicious person before local police discovered Crooks on the roof of a nearby glass research company’s building. That discovery occurred shortly before Crooks opened fire, according to law enforcement sources.

The timing of these events raises concerns about whether additional precautions could have been implemented to prevent Crook’s actions. It is worth considering whether this assassin would have been treated differently if he had been Black. Comparing both events can provide insight into potential biases and disparities in treatment based on race.

The fact that the suspect in Trump’s assassination attempt in Pennsylvania was White and was handled with such reluctance and oversight, while the Black homeless man in Milwaukee was shot and killed instantly by police, highlights the disparities in how individuals of different races are treated by law enforcement. This raises questions about whether race played a role in how both incidents were handled and whether there are underlying biases that need to be addressed within the criminal justice system.

Authorities claimed that the fatal shooting in Milwaukee was not connected to the convention. However, this incident sheds light on larger concerns regarding the use of external law enforcement for events such as conventions. Furthermore, it is important to examine these cases closely and consider how systemic racism may be influencing outcomes in similar situations. By acknowledging these disparities, we can work towards creating a more just and equitable society for all individuals, regardless of their race.

Despite efforts to address systemic racism and improve police-community relations, recent events such as the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Daunte Wright have highlighted the ongoing challenges and injustices faced by Black Americans at the hands of law enforcement. These incidents serve as a stark reminder that there is still much work to be done to achieve true equality and justice for all individuals, regardless of race. It is clear that while progress has been made in some areas, the reality on the ground continues to show that racial disparities and police brutality remain pervasive issues in America.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo,PhD, is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Trending