Connect with us

Nigeria

The Tragedy of Lai Mohammed’s Spiteful Narrative on Lekki Massacre

Published

on

“It is a disaster that someone who is ready to use government paraphernalia to attempt to intimidate and force a narrative down the throat of Nigerians” ―Ebuka Onyekwelu

Nigeria’s Minister of Information Alhaji Lai Mohammed, has continued unabated with his single narrative that no one was killed at the Lekki Tollgate scandalous event over a year ago, during the endsars protest. Only a few months ago, Mr. Lai was threatening CNN for the effrontery to independently investigate and actually affirm that Nigeria army officers shot at peaceful protesters with live bullets and killed many in the process. The audacity of the report was such that it rattled minister Lai Mohammed so much that he had to call a press conference to address the issues raised in CNN’s detailed investigation. During the press conference, he then accused the giant news company of meddling in the internal affairs of Nigeria and being part of a certain plan to destabilize Nigeria, while insisting that the army did not shoot with live bullets and that nobody died at Lekki Tollgate. CNN responded in kind insisting that its report is credible.

Typical of a Nigerian panel of inquiry which usually dies and never resurrect, the Endsars panels of inquiry in nearly all the states where they were instituted have since disappeared. Only the Lagos state EndSars panel has been able to complete its task and submit its report. In Anambra which has some of the worst tales of police brutality and where a notorious SARS operative who many accuse of the “disappearance” of their loved ones held sway, the panel set up by the state government has not sat beyond its preliminary stage. This is the situation in most states where there is a judicial panel of inquiry on Endsars. But in Lagos state, it was different. Upon submission of the panel’s report to the governor of Lagos state, while the whitepaper on the panel’s report is still being expected, Alhaji Lai Mohammed has gone on to call another press conference to discredit the report submitted by the Lagos state judicial panel of inquiry on Endsars and police brutality. Not only picking holes in the report which was only leaked to the public as the findings and report of the panel is not formally made public, but regrettably preempting the expected whitepaper on the panel’s report.

He obviously, is not interested in getting to the logical conclusion of what really happened at Lekki Tollgate

Lai Mohammed, it appears is not interested in whether people were actually killed at Lekki Tollgate by government forces. He obviously, is not interested in getting to the logical and satisfactory conclusion of what really happened at Lekki Tollgate; something every responsible citizen should be interested in. His singular preoccupation is to continue to insist against good conscience, that nobody was killed by the military at Lekki Tollgate on 20th October 2020 and for him, perhaps the government he represents, it is better to sweep whatever happened at Lekki Tollgate one year ago under the carpet, than for people in authority to take responsibility. There could hardly be anything more unfortunate. This posturing admittedly is not strange because Nigerian government officials are averse to being asked some questions and the government is not used to providing convincing evidence-based answers when they choose to respond. This is the only reason a minister of Nigeria will have the courage to trivialize and dismiss facts in the name of defending the government.

The tragedy really is to think that someone, so averse to due process and to the normal procedure of investigating scandalous and suspicious issues such as the Lekki event, is an official of the Nigerian government, its spokesman for that matter. That Lai has continued to make wild, but baseless claims that nobody died at the shooting by military officers, on the evening of October 20th speaks to the depth of the rot in Nigeria. If Mr. Lai was the governor of Lagos, the panel would have simply vanished as they did in many other states.

If Mr. Lai was the governor of Lagos, the panel would have simply vanished as they did in many other states.

It is a disaster that someone who is ready to use government paraphernalia to attempt to intimidate and force a narrative down the throat of Nigerians and observes all over the world is the mouthpiece of the government of the day. This impliedly indicates that Lai’s position is one and the same as that of the government he represents. Without a doubt, minister Lai is not interested in anything else aside from his own storyline that nobody died at Lekki Tollgate. Curiously, he, and his gang of government defenders on government payroll, are the only ones pushing this story that nobody died at Lekki Tollgate a year ago, against all available evidence and commonsense. But then, for the benefit of doubt, what is even more worrisome is if what Lai Mohammed says represents the position of the federal government on the brutalization and state execution of peaceful protesters at Lekki Tollgate last year October.

For a year, some agents of the federal government demanded evidence that suggests that people were killed by the military at Lekki Tollgate. Some of them even asked that people should exercise patience for the judicial panels of inquiry to conclude their inquiries. With the leaked report of the Lagos panel, names of both injured and killed victims were gathered and documented, with strong evidence that soldiers shot at with live bullets and killed innocent protesters, should weigh heavier than any political allegiance. If anything, a thinking government should not allow or tolerate its mouthpiece coming out to discredit albeit baselessly, such heavily indicting report.

Lai Mohammed is subjecting murdered innocent citizens to atrocious dishonor even in their death. What can possibly be more comic and tragic at the same time as the unfounded insistence by Lai Mohammed that no one was killed? If the federal government still cares about anything, then, Lai Mohammed should be cautioned at least, but what he deserves is a clean sack. A government that abuses its citizens alive, and dishonours them in death, is a government that is at war with its own citizens. The government no matter how averse to the feelings of the governed must have a human face, much less the one that prides itself as democratic.

♦ Ebuka Onyekwelu, strategic governance exponent,  is a columnist with the WAP

 

 

Houston

Houston and Owerri Community Mourn the Passing of Beloved Icon, Lawrence Mike Obinna Anozie

Published

on

Houston was thrown into mourning on September 19, 2025, following the sudden passing of businessman and community advocate Lawrence Mike Obinna Anozie, who peacefully joined his ancestors. Immediate family member in Houston, Nick Anozie, confirmed his untimely death and expressed gratitude for the outpouring of love and condolences from both the Houston and Owerri communities.

Lawrence was born to Chief Alexander and Lolo Ether Anozie of Owerri in Imo State, Nigeria, and will be dearly remembered by family members, friends, and the entire Houston community.

An accomplished accountant, the late Lawrence incorporated and successfully managed three major companies: Universal Insurance Company, LLC, Universal Mortgage LLC, and Universal Financial Services. Through these enterprises, he not only built a thriving business career but also created opportunities for countless individuals to achieve financial stability. His contributions to entrepreneurship and community development will remain a lasting legacy.

According to the family, arrangements for his final funeral rites are in progress and will be announced in due course.

Lawrence will forever be remembered as a loving and compassionate man who dedicated much of his life to uplifting others. He helped countless young Nigerians and African Americans overcome economic challenges by providing mentorship, financial guidance, and career opportunities. His generosity touched the lives of many who otherwise might not have found their footing. A devout Catholic, he was unwavering in his faith and never missed Mass, drawing strength and inspiration from his church community. To those who knew him, Lawrence was not only a successful businessman but also a pillar of kindness, humility, and faith whose legacy of service and compassion will continue to inspire generations.

For more information, please contact Nick Anozie – 832-891-2213

Continue Reading

News

Enugu Revenue Leader Details Tax Plans, Commits to Responsible Fund Management

Published

on

In a bid to address rising public concerns and social media speculations about taxation in Enugu State, the Executive Chairman of the Enugu State Internal Revenue Service (ESIRS), Emmanuel Nnamani, has provided clarifications on the government’s tax policies. During a press briefing in Enugu, Nnamani dismissed what he described as “false and misleading claims” and reassured residents that the government’s fiscal operations are firmly rooted in law, transparency, and public good.

Clarifying Misinformation and Affirming Legality

Nnamani opened the session by stressing that no taxes or levies in Enugu State are imposed outside the provisions of the law. “Taxes and revenues in Enugu State remain within the limits of the law. We do not impose any levies outside what the law permits,” he stated, pointing to the Personal Income Tax Act (as amended) as the guiding legal framework.

He explained that the ESIRS collects personal income tax through two lawful means: Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE) for those in formal employment, and Direct Assessment for informal sector workers. While compliance among salaried workers has been largely smooth, the agency sometimes employs legal enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance among self-employed individuals.

Formalising the Informal Sector

A key challenge, he noted, has been bringing the informal sector—especially market traders and transport operators—into the formal tax net. Upon assuming office, his administration discovered that an overwhelming 99% of informal sector actors were not remitting taxes to the state, largely due to the disruptive influence of non-state actors engaged in illegal collections.

In response, the government introduced a consolidated ₦36,000 annual levy for market traders. This amount, payable between January and March, covers all relevant state-level charges, including those by the Enugu State Waste Management Agency (ESWAMA), Enugu State Structures for Signage and Advertisement Agency (ENSSAA), storage fees, and business premises levies. “Once this amount is paid between January and March, the trader owes nothing else for that year,” Nnamani clarified. Traders who fail to pay by March 31 are subject to enforcement.

For street vendors operating outside structured markets, an annual levy of ₦30,000 applies, with ESWAMA charges handled separately. Transport operators such as Okada riders, Keke drivers, minibuses, tankers, and trucks pay via a daily ticketing system.

A Human-Faced Approach to Enforcement

Although the law allows for a 10% penalty on unpaid tax and an interest charge tied to the Central Bank’s Monetary Policy Rate of 27.5%, Nnamani disclosed that the state has adopted a softer, pro-business approach. Instead of the full punitive charges, a flat ₦3,000 penalty is applied in most informal sector cases to promote ease of doing business and encourage voluntary compliance.

Taxation and the Cost of Rent

Addressing growing concerns over rising rent, Nnamani rejected claims linking the trend to state tax policies. He described the issue as a national challenge influenced by supply and demand, rather than fiscal policy.

Citing personal experiences dating back to 2015, he observed that a shift in private development preference – from rental apartments to gated residential estates – has contributed to the housing squeeze. “If we had more high-rise buildings, rent would drop,” he noted. The state government, he added, is taking proactive steps through the Ministry of Housing and Housing Development Corporation to build mass housing and student hostels near institutions like ESUT and IMT, freeing up central city housing and helping moderate rents.

Technology, Transparency, and Trust

In line with its commitment to transparency and digital innovation, the ESIRS has launched a tax calculator on its official portal – www.irs.en.gov.ng – allowing residents to compute their taxes with ease and clarity. “This is about transparency and giving our people confidence,” he said, inviting residents to compare Enugu’s tools with those in more advanced states like Lagos.

Understanding the Cost of Development

Responding to concerns that Enugu has become one of Nigeria’s most expensive states, Nnamani acknowledged the perception but clarified that the temporary inflation is largely demand-driven. With Enugu undertaking widespread infrastructural renewal – including smart schools, primary health centres, and hospitality infrastructure – the surge in construction activity has led to increased demand for building materials like granite and rods, which are sourced from other states.

“Once these projects are completed, demand will drop, and prices will stabilise,” he assured. He emphasised that the projects are visible testaments to what taxpayers’ money can achieve when properly managed.

A Call for Mutual Understanding and Civic Partnership

More than a tax clarification, Nnamani’s address served as a reminder of the symbiotic relationship between citizens and government. He appealed for public understanding, noting that when citizens fulfil their tax obligations, the government can, in turn, provide essential services and infrastructure that uplift everyone.

His message was clear: responsible taxation, managed transparently and invested wisely, is the bedrock of sustainable development. From roads to schools and healthcare to housing, Enugu State is demonstrating how taxpayers’ money, when efficiently deployed, can improve lives and build the future.

Continue Reading

Column

The Leadership Deficit: Why African Governance Lacks Philosophical Grounding

Published

on

Leadership across nations is shaped not only by policies but by the quality of the individuals at the helm. History has shown that the most transformative leaders often draw from deep wells of ethical, philosophical, and strategic thought. Yet, in many African countries—and Nigeria in particular—there appears to be a crisis in the kind of men elevated to govern. This deficit is not merely political; it is intellectual, philosophical, and deeply structural.

There is a compelling correlation between the absence of foundational wisdom and the type of leaders Nigeria consistently produces. Compared to their counterparts in other parts of the world, Nigerian leaders often appear fundamentally unprepared to govern societies in ways that foster justice, progress, or stability.

Consider the Middle East—nations like the UAE and Qatar—where governance is often rooted in Islamic principles. While these societies are not without flaws, their leaders have harnessed religious teachings as frameworks for nation-building, modern infrastructure, and citizen welfare. Ironically, many of Nigeria’s military and political leaders also profess Islam, yet the application of its ethical standards in public governance is nearly non-existent. This raises a troubling question: is the practice of religion in African politics largely symbolic, devoid of actionable moral guidance?

Take China as another case study. In the last four decades, China’s leadership has lifted over 800 million people out of poverty—an unprecedented feat in human history. While authoritarian in structure, China’s model demonstrates a deep philosophical commitment to collective progress, discipline, and strategic long-term planning. In Western democracies, especially post-World War II, leaders often emerged with strong academic backgrounds in philosophy, economics, or history—disciplines that sharpen the mind and cultivate vision.

In stark contrast, African leaders—particularly in Nigeria—are more often preoccupied with short-term political survival than long-term national transformation. Their legacy is frequently one of mismanagement, unsustainable debt, and structural decay. Nigeria, for example, has accumulated foreign loans that could take generations to repay, yet there is little visible infrastructure or social development to justify such liabilities. Inflation erodes wages, and basic public services remain in collapse. This cycle repeats because those in power often lack not just technical competence, but the moral and intellectual depth to lead a modern nation.

At the heart of the crisis is a lack of philosophical inquiry. Philosophy teaches reasoning, ethics, and the nature of justice—skills that are essential for public leadership. Nigerian leaders, by and large, are disconnected from such traditions. Many have never seriously engaged with political theory, ethical discourse, or economic philosophy. Without this grounding, leadership becomes a matter of brute power, not enlightened governance.

The crisis of leadership in Africa is not solely one of corruption or bad policy—it is one of intellectual emptiness. Until African nations, especially Nigeria, begin to value and cultivate leaders who are intellectually rigorous and philosophically grounded, the continent will remain caught in cycles of poverty and poor governance. True leadership requires more than charisma or military rank—it demands the wisdom to govern a society with justice, vision, and moral clarity. Without this, the future remains perilously fragile.

♦ Dominic Ikeogu is a social and political commentator based in Minneapolis, USA.

Continue Reading

Trending