Connect with us

Journal and Papers

Nobel Peace Prize for Journalists Serves As Reminder that Freedom of the Press is Under Threat

Published

on

By Dr. Kathy Kiely

Thirty-two years ago next month, I was in Germany reporting on the fall of the Berlin Wall, an event then heralded as a triumph of Western democratic liberalism and even “the end of history.”

But democracy isn’t doing so well across the globe now. Nothing underscores how far we have come from that moment of irrational exuberance than the powerful warning the Nobel Prize Committee felt compelled to issue on Oct. 8, 2021 in awarding its coveted Peace Prize to two reporters.

“They are representative for all journalists,” Berit Reiss-Andersen, the chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, said in announcing the award to Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov, “in a world in which democracy and freedom of the press face increasingly adverse conditions.”

The honor for Muratov, the co-founder of Russia’s Novaya Gazeta, and Ressa, the CEO of the Philippine news site Rappler, is enormously important. In part that’s because of the protection that global attention may afford two journalists under imminent and relentless threat from the strongmen who run their respective countries. “The world is watching,” Reiss-Andersen pointedly noted in an interview after making the announcement.

Equally important is the larger message the committee wanted to deliver. “Without media, you cannot have a strong democracy,” Reiss-Andersen said.

Global political threats

The two laureates’ cases highlight an emergency for civil society: Muratov, editor of what the Nobel Prize Committee described as “the most independent paper in Russia today,” has seen six of his colleagues slain for their work criticizing Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

Ressa, a former CNN reporter, is under a de facto travel ban because the government of Rodrigo Duterte, in an obvious attempt to bankrupt Rappler, has filed so many legal cases against the website that Ressa must go from judge to judge to ask permission any time she wants to leave the country.

Inevitably, Ressa told me recently, one of them says “no.” Maybe that will change now that she has a date in Stockholm. But Ressa probably knows better than to hold her breath.

Last year, when I – a long-time journalist turned professor of journalism – helped organize a group of fellow Princeton alumni to sign a letter of support for Ressa, more than 400 responded. They included members of Congress and state legislatures and former diplomats who served presidents of both parties. One of them was former Secretary of State George P. Shultz, who died several months later, making a show of solidarity with Maria Ressa one of his last public acts. This show of support is a sign of what’s at stake.

Three decades after the downfall of totalitarian regimes in Eastern Europe, forces of darkness and intolerance are on the march. Journalists are the canaries down the noxious mine shaft. Attacks on them are becoming more brazen: whether it is the grisly dismemberment of Saudi dissident and writer Jamal Khashoggi, the grounding of a commercial airplane to snatch a Belarusian journalist or the infamous graffiti “Murder the Media” scrawled onto a door of the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection.

This irrational hatred of purveyors of facts knows no ideology. Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s disdain for the press is at least equaled by that of leftist Nicaraguan leader Daniel Ortega, whose response to his critics in the media has been to, well, lock ‘em up.

Digital menace

What makes today’s threats to free expression especially insidious is that they don’t come just from the usual suspects – thuggish government censors.

They are amplified and weaponized by social media networks that claim the privilege of free speech protection while they allow themselves to be hijacked by slanderers and propagandists.

No one has done more to expose the complicity of these platforms in the attack on democracy than Ressa, a tech enthusiast who built her publication’s website to interface with Facebook and now accuses the company of endangering her own freedom with its laissez-faire approach to the slander being propagated on its site.

“Freedom of expression is full of paradoxes,” the Nobel Committee’s Reiss-Andersen observed, in an interview after awarding the Peace Prize. She made it clear that the award to Ressa and Muratov was intended to tackle those paradoxes too.

Asked why the Peace Prize went to two individual journalists – rather than to one of the press freedom organizations, such as the Committee to Protect Journalists, that have represented Ressa, Muratov and so many of their endangered colleagues – Reiss-Anderson said the Nobel Committee deliberately chose working reporters.

Ressa and Muratov represent “a golden standard,” she said, of “journalism of high quality.” In other words, they are fact-finders and truth-seekers, not purveyors of clickbait.

That golden standard is increasingly endangered, in large part because of the digital revolution that shattered the business model for public service journalism.

“Free, independent and fact-based journalism serves to protect against abuse of power,” Reiss-Andersen said in the prize announcement. But it is increasingly being undermined and supplanted by what’s called “content,” served up algorithmically from sources that are not transparent in ways that are designed to addict and that drive partisanship, tribalism and division.

This poses a challenge for public policymakers and the democracies they represent. How to regulate digital media and still protect free speech? How to support the labor-intensive work of journalism and still protect its independence?

Answering those questions won’t be easy. But democracy may be at a tipping point. With its recognition of two investigative journalists and the crucial – and dangerous – work they do to support democracy, the Nobel Committee has invited us to begin the debate.

Kathy Kiely, Professor and Lee Hills Chair of Free Press Studies, University of Missouri-Columbia

Editor’s note: Naomi Schalit, senior politics editor at The Conversation, signed the open letter “In defense of press freedom” organized by author Kathy Kiely in July 2020.

*This article was first published in The Conversation.

Books

The General’s Tale: A Chronicle of Service, Regret, and Silence

Published

on

  • Book Title: A Journey in Service
  • Author: Ibrahim B. Babangida
  • Publishers: Bookcraft
  • Reviewer: Emeaba Emeaba
  • Pages: 440

In the annals of Nigerian history, few figures loom as large—or as polarizing—as Ibrahim Babangida, the military ruler who held sway from 1985 to 1993. Known to some as the “Maradona” of politics for his nimble maneuvering and to others as an “evil genius” for his controversial decisions, Babangida has long been a cipher, his legacy a battleground of competing narratives. His new autobiography, A Journey in Service, promises to peel back the layers of this enigmatic leader. What emerges, however, is a portrait both revealing and reticent—a calculated blend of candor and evasion that invites readers into the mind of a man wrestling with his past, yet unwilling to fully confront its shadows.

The book opens with a disarming simplicity, tracing Babangida’s arc from humble origins in Minna to the corridors of power in Lagos. His prose, clear and occasionally lyrical, sketches a life shaped by ambition and camaraderie, from sharing shirts with childhood friend Mamman Vatsa in their bachelor days to navigating the treacherous currents of military hierarchy. This early narrative sets the stage for his presidency, a period he frames as one of service and sacrifice. He highlights tangible achievements—economic reforms, infrastructure projects, and institutions like MAMSER and DIFFRI—casting himself as a steward of progress amid turbulent times. Yet, as the story unfolds, it becomes clear that A Journey in Service is less a reckoning with history than a meticulous exercise in self-fashioning.

At the heart of the book lies the annulment of the June 12, 1993, election—a wound that still festers in Nigeria’s collective memory. Widely regarded as the nation’s freest and fairest vote, it was poised to usher in civilian rule until Babangida’s regime abruptly voided the results, plunging the country into chaos. For the first time, Babangida expresses regret, acknowledging Moshood Abiola’s victory and calling the annulment an “accident of history.” “The nation is entitled to expect my expression of regret,” he writes, a statement that has stirred both praise and skepticism. Yet, his attempt to shift blame to General Sani Abacha and other officers feels like a sleight of hand—an effort to cast himself as a reluctant participant rather than the architect of a decision that altered Nigeria’s trajectory. The admission, while striking, lacks the depth of accountability that might have transformed it into a genuine mea culpa.

This selective candor extends to other fraught episodes. The execution of Mamman Vatsa, convicted of plotting a coup in 1986, is recounted with a mix of nostalgia and froideur. Babangida paints a vivid picture of their closeness— “we did several things together as peers”—before revealing a “recurrent peer jealousy” he now perceives in hindsight. The decision to approve Vatsa’s death, he argues, was a stark choice “between saving a friend’s life and the nation’s future.” It’s a poignant reflection, yet one that sidesteps broader questions about the trial’s fairness or the political climate that made such a choice inevitable. Similarly, his discussion of Nigeria’s first coup in 1966 challenges the “Igbo coup” label by highlighting the diverse ethnic makeup of the plotters and the role of Major John Obienu in quelling it. This revisionist take, while intriguing, feels more like a footnote than a fulsome exploration of a pivotal moment that sparked the Biafran War.

Perhaps the most unguarded moments come in Babangida’s tender tribute to his late wife, Maryam, Nigeria’s iconic first lady until her death in 2009. “Her ebony beauty set off enchanting eyes,” he writes, recalling a partnership marked by mutual devotion and rare discord. Their love story, woven through four decades, offers a humanizing counterpoint to the book’s political machinations, revealing a man capable of vulnerability—if only in the personal sphere. Yet even here, the narrative serves a purpose, reinforcing Babangida’s image as a figure of depth and relatability amid his sterner legacy.

What A Journey in Service omits is as telling as what it includes. The assassination of journalist Dele Giwa, the mysterious $12.4 billion Gulf War oil windfall, and other stains on Babangida’s tenure are met with a resounding silence. These absences lend the book an air of strategic curation, as if Babangida seeks to polish his record rather than illuminate it. The timing of its release, amid Nigeria’s current struggles, and the lavish donations at its launch by people who have never set up a business, manufactured any products or even sold any goods suggest is an eloquent reminder of his enduring clout within the elite.

Critics and admirers alike will find fodder in these pages. Babangida’s willingness to address June 12, however imperfectly, has won plaudits from some, including President Bola Tinubu, who hailed his courage at the launch. Others, like Abiola’s son Jamiu, see it as a belated balm, a step toward peace if not justice. Yet the book’s detractors decry its evasions, arguing that it sidesteps the raw honesty Nigeria deserves. This divide mirrors Babangida’s own duality—a leader lauded for infrastructure yet lambasted for corruption, a reformer who clung to power until forced out.

In the tradition of political memoir, A Journey in Service is a study in the malleability of memory. It offers a window into a complex figure, but the view is obscured by the author’s own hand. Readers seeking a definitive account of Babangida’s rule will emerge unsatisfied; those intrigued by the interplay of power and narrative will find a richer vein to mine. Sophisticated yet guarded, the book is a testament to its author’s skill at controlling the story—even if, in the end, it reveals more through its silences than its words. Babangida’s journey, it seems, remains as much a riddle as the man himself, a legacy still contested in the crucible of history.

_________

♦ Dr. Emeaba, the author of “A Dictionary of Literature,” writes dime novels in the style of the Onitsha Market Literature sub-genre.

Continue Reading

Books

Raising Ramparts: Christie Ohuabunwa’s “Warrior Parenting”

Published

on

  • Book Title: Your Child is a Target
  • Author: Christie Ohuabunwa
  • Publishers: Cornerstone Publishing.
  • Reviewer: Emeaba Emeaba
  • Pages: 111

In the clamorous digital age, where information flows freely and often unchecked, Christie Ohuabunwa’s “Your Child is a Target” (A parent’s guide to safeguarding children from modern threats) emerges as a fervent call to arms for parents seeking to safeguard their offspring from perceived societal and spiritual pitfalls.  Across a concise 111 pages, Dr. Ohuabunwa, a self-proclaimed spiritual warrior and ordained minister, constructs a fortress of biblical precepts, offering a roadmap for navigating the complexities of modern child-rearing.  Yet, while the book’s foundations are firmly rooted in evangelical tradition, its ramparts, built on a worldview of spiritual warfare and stringent control, may prove too restrictive for some.

Ohuabunwa’s central thesis posits the home as a sanctuary, a “spiritual fortress” requiring constant vigilance against encroaching threats.  Scripture, drawn heavily from Proverbs, Ephesians, and Matthew, serves as both mortar and ammunition in this defensive architecture.  While this scriptural emphasis will resonate deeply with those steeped in evangelical thought, secular readers may find the pervasive biblical literalism overly prescriptive.  Indeed, the author’s unwavering emphasis on parental authority, particularly in regulating media consumption and social interactions, raises crucial questions about the delicate balance between guidance and coercion.  While “grace and truth” are invoked, the scales tip decidedly toward the latter, leaving the reader to ponder whether the children within these fortified walls are being nurtured or, perhaps, unduly regimented.

The book’s most compelling, and arguably most disquieting, sections delve into the concept of spiritual warfare as an intrinsic element of parenting.  Ohuabunwa casts childhood as a contested battleground where demonic forces relentlessly seek to corrupt and infiltrate.  This worldview, while not uncommon within certain religious circles, risks cultivating an atmosphere of perpetual anxiety.  The author’s advocacy for spiritual discernment, while laudable in principle, occasionally veers into the realm of paranoia, leaving the reader to question whether such a heightened sense of threat fosters resilience or, conversely, a self-perpetuating cycle of fear.

Ohuabunwa’s analysis of Generation Z, the so-called “digital natives,” further complicates the narrative.  She acknowledges their inherent vulnerability within the digital landscape while simultaneously recognizing their potential for “digital discipleship.”  The author encourages parents to engage with their children’s online world, even suggesting the deployment of memes and TikTok videos as vehicles for biblical truths.  Yet, this embrace of technology is tempered by a deep-seated suspicion of its insidious potential, warning against the lurking dangers of “evil connections” forged through social media.  This paradoxical approach – leveraging the very tools deemed potentially harmful – reflects a broader ambivalence towards technology prevalent within many religious communities.

The author’s staunch advocacy for discipline, a cornerstone of many parenting philosophies, is presented with a rigidity that feels somewhat anachronistic in the current cultural climate.  Her pronouncements on “corrective punishment” and the imperative to eradicate “foolishness” from a child’s heart raise concerns about the potential for emotional and psychological harm. While cautioning against “provoking children to wrath,” the demarcation between discipline and aggression remains, at times, disconcertingly blurred.

The inclusion of 60 “spiritual warfare prayers” offers a practical application of Ohuabunwa’s theological framework.  These invocations, ranging from petitions for protection to declarations against generational curses, provide a glimpse into the author’s spiritual arsenal.  However, their sheer volume and often forceful language may prove alienating to those outside her specific faith tradition.

In the context of contemporary dialogues surrounding parenting, technology, and religious freedom, “Warrior Parenting” occupies a unique and potentially contentious space.  While resonating with a long lineage of Christian parenting manuals, it also reflects the anxieties of a society grappling with rapid technological and cultural shifts.  Ultimately, Ohuabunwa’s work offers a compelling, albeit at times unsettling, window into the spiritual and cultural landscape of contemporary evangelicalism, serving as a testament to the enduring challenges of raising children in a world perceived as both promising and perilous.

See the book on Amazon: >>>>>

_________

♦ Dr. Emeaba, the author of “A Dictionary of Literature,” writes dime novels in the style of the Onitsha Market Literature sub-genre.

Continue Reading

Books

A Scathing Indictment of Nigeria’s Judiciary: A Legal Insider’s Crusade Against Corruption

Published

on

  • Book Title: Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System
  • Author: Dele Farotimi
  • Publishers: Dele Farotimi Publishers
  • Reviewer: Emeaba Emeaba
  • Pages: 115

It isn’t easy being Dele Farotimi. He seems to relish challenging authority, relentlessly poking the proverbial bear. His 2019 book, Do Not Die in Their War, throws social media’s incendiary power onto Nigeria’s already volatile political landscape—a raw, unfiltered explosion of commentary that fearlessly exposes the nation’s festering wounds.  In 2021, he published The Imperatives of The Nigerian Revolution—a scathing and sweeping critique that depicts a nation on the brink of implosion, offering what some might consider a naive pacifist fantasy as a remedy, a desperate, perhaps delusional, attempt to bandage a gaping wound while the elite continue to hemorrhage the nation’s lifeblood.  Even as he audaciously continued to provoke those in power, seemingly oblivious to the potential consequences, his books were being intensely scrutinized by the very individuals he portrayed as too ruthless and arrogant to care – the establishment politicians.  Those at the sharp end of his blunt, uncompromising prose angrily ground their teeth and bided their time, while multiple articles and online commentaries dissected his arguments, precisely because they resonated with the growing discontent simmering within the populace.

Now, Farotimi has written a new book.  “The judiciary is hopeless and unfit for purpose,” declares Dele Farotimi in Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System, a searing exposé of the rot festering at the heart of Nigeria’s legal institutions. Farotimi, an author, political activist, and lawyer with over two decades of experience, pulls no punches. His book is a damning indictment of a system he argues has become a weapon for the powerful to exploit the vulnerable, manipulate the law, and perpetuate injustice.  Drawing from his firsthand experiences, Farotimi weaves a narrative that is as much a personal memoir as it is a forensic analysis of systemic corruption.  The result is a work that is both deeply unsettling and profoundly necessary—a clarion call for reform in a nation where justice is often a commodity auctioned to the highest bidder.

In Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System, Farotimi depicts the Nigerian justice system not merely as inadequate, but as utterly broken—so much so that he feels compelled to go beyond mere theorizing and issue a resounding call to action.  Structured around his professional journey, from his early days as a young lawyer navigating the labyrinthine corridors of Nigeria’s legal system to his eventual disillusionment with a judiciary he describes as “systemically putrefied,” Farotimi’s book transcends a mere critique of the legal profession; it is a reflection of Nigeria’s broader societal malaise.

Farotimi’s account of the Eletu case underscores the insidious intersection of law, politics, and economics in a country where power remains concentrated in the hands of a select few. This case serves as a stark illustration of the pervasive land disputes that plague Nigeria, where fraudulent claims and judicial manipulation are routinely employed to dispossess ordinary citizens of their property. The level of alleged condescension and manipulation is breathtaking. Page after page, Farotimi’s book delivers a damning indictment of a system he argues has become a tool for the powerful to exploit the weak, manipulate the law, and perpetuate injustice. Utilizing the Eletu family case—a sprawling legal saga that epitomizes the dysfunction of Nigeria’s criminal justice system—which involved a fraudulent claim by the Eletu family, he exposes the alleged collusion between senior lawyers, judges, and government officials to manipulate the law for personal gain. Farotimi meticulously details how the Supreme Court’s judgment was allegedly doctored, how warrants were fraudulently procured, and how the judiciary allegedly became complicit in a scheme to extort billions of Naira from innocent landowners.  While the book speaks to the global issue of judicial corruption, offering a case study that resonates beyond Nigeria’s borders, it can also be viewed within the context of a growing body of literature examining the failures of legal systems in developing countries, from Sarah Chayes’ Thieves of State to Jennifer Widner’s Building the Rule of Law.

However, what distinguishes Farotimi’s book is its intensely personal perspective. Unlike academic treatises on corruption, Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System is grounded in the lived experience of a practitioner who has witnessed the system’s inner workings firsthand. Farotimi’s prose is sharp and unflinching, seamlessly blending legal analysis with personal anecdotes to create a narrative that is both informative and emotionally resonant. He doesn’t hesitate to name names, implicating senior lawyers like Afe Babalola and S.B. Joseph, as well as judges like Justice Atilade and Justice Rhodes-Vivour, in the corruption he alleges plagues the judiciary. His critique isn’t confined to individuals; he also dissects the structural flaws that enable such abuses, from the perceived lack of accountability within the judiciary to the alleged complicity of the Lagos State government.

Farotimi’s book is a powerful and important contribution, but it is not without its limitations.  One of its greatest strengths, its unflinching honesty, can also be perceived as a potential weakness. Farotimi pulls no punches, whether describing the alleged incompetence of judges or the purported greed of senior lawyers.  His willingness to name names and expose the inner workings of the legal system is both courageous and necessary, particularly in a country where such issues are often suppressed.  The book’s narrative structure, centered around the Eletu case, provides a compelling framework for his broader critique of the criminal justice system. The case functions as a vehicle for exploring themes like corruption, impunity, and the abuse of power, while also offering a human element that maintains reader engagement.

However, this focus on the Eletu case can also be considered a constraint. While undeniably significant, the case may not be fully representative of all the challenges confronting Nigeria’s criminal justice system. Farotimi could have broadened his analysis to encompass other cases or systemic issues, such as the treatment of criminal defendants or the difficulties faced by law enforcement. Another potential weakness is the book’s occasional lack of nuance.  While Farotimi’s critique of the judiciary is potent, his portrayal of all judges and lawyers as corrupt or complicit risks oversimplifying a complex issue. There are undoubtedly individuals within the legal profession committed to justice, and their voices are largely absent from the narrative. Finally, while Farotimi’s prose is generally clear and engaging, it can occasionally become overly dense, particularly when discussing legal technicalities, potentially making the book less accessible to readers without a legal background.

Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System is a sobering and essential read for anyone interested in the rule of law, corruption, or the challenges facing Nigeria.  Farotimi’s account of the Eletu case serves as a powerful reminder of the human cost of judicial corruption and the critical importance of holding those in power accountable. The book is a compelling and courageous exposé that shines a light on the corruption allegedly plaguing Nigeria’s legal system.  It is essential reading for anyone concerned with justice, accountability, and the rule of law.

_________

♦ Dr. Emeaba, the author of “A Dictionary of Literature,” writes dime novels in the style of the Onitsha Market Literature sub-genre.

Continue Reading

Trending