Connect with us

Column

Navigating Christmas in the Digital Age: Avoiding Pitfalls and Embracing Meaningful Celebrations

Published

1 year ago

on

In the digital age, Christmas has taken on a new dimension, with the proliferation of technology and online platforms transforming how we celebrate this festive season. While the advancements in digital tools offer convenience, connectivity, and innovation, there are also potential pitfalls and wrong approaches that can detract from the true spirit of Christmas. From the overemphasis on materialism and digital disconnect from loved ones to the environmental impact of our digital activities and the risk of digital overload, it is crucial to navigate the digital landscape mindfully to preserve the essence of Christmas. This piece explores the wrong approach to Christmas Day in the digital age, highlighting the challenges and implications of falling victim to these pitfalls.

The Christmas spirit is palpable as we don our festive sweaters and sip hot cocoa. Yet, in this digital age, are we truly embracing the essence of the holiday season? With social media at our fingertips and endless online shopping options, how are we navigating this traditional day of celebration in a world dominated by technology? Let us delve into how the digital era has reshaped our experiences and explore how we can ensure that the true spirit of Christmas is not lost in the virtual realm.
Indeed, in the digital age, Christmas Day has taken on a new level of excitement and interconnectedness. Here are a few ways in which the holiday is experienced in the digital era:
1. Online shopping: The rise of e-commerce has made purchasing gifts for loved ones quicker and easier. People can browse and buy presents from the comfort of their own homes, with many retailers offering special discounts and promotions for the holiday season.
2. Virtual celebrations: With many families living far apart, video calls and online platforms have become popular for connecting with loved ones on Christmas Day. People can gather virtually to exchange gifts, share meals, and participate in holiday traditions, even miles apart.
3. Social media: Christmas is widely shared on social media platforms, with people posting photos of their decorations, meals, and celebrations. It has become a way to spread holiday cheer and connect with others worldwide who are also celebrating.
4. Digital decorations: With the rise of innovative technology, many people use digital displays and light shows to decorate their homes for the holidays. Technology has made it easier to create a festive atmosphere, from colourful LED lights to synchronised music displays.
5. Online entertainment: Streaming services offer a wide range of holiday-themed movies, songs, and shows for people to enjoy on Christmas Day. Families can cosy on the couch and watch their favourite Christmas classics or discover new holiday content together.
In the digital age, Christmas has become more connected, convenient, and customisable. From online shopping to virtual celebrations, technology has transformed the holiday season and brought people closer together, even when they are physically apart.
How has the digital age revolutionised how we celebrate Christmas, leading to highly cost-effective methods of spreading holiday cheer? From virtual gatherings to online gift exchanges, the impact of technology on our festive traditions is undeniable. As we navigate this new landscape of digital celebrations, have we lost sight of the true essence of Christmas in favour of convenience and affordability? Let us delve into the implications of this cost-effective approach to Christmas celebrations and explore how we can balance embracing technology and preserving the magic of the holiday season.
One highly cost-effective way of celebrating Christmas in the digital age is using digital resources and platforms. Here are some ways this can be achieved and the impact it can have overall:
1. Virtual gift exchanges: Instead of purchasing physical gifts, consider organising a virtual exchange with friends and family. Websites and apps like Elfster allow participants to create wish lists, draw names, and exchange gifts online, saving money on shipping and reducing waste from packaging.
Impact: This can reduce the financial burden of buying multiple gifts and minimise the environmental impact of traditional gift-giving practices.
2. DIY digital greetings and decorations: Create personalized digital greeting cards or decorations using online design tools or apps. These can be shared digitally with loved ones, saving the cost of purchasing physical cards and decorations.
Impact: This saves money and reduces paper waste and the carbon footprint of producing and distributing physical cards and decorations.
3. Online subscription services: Consider gifting an online subscription service (such as streaming services, e-books, or online courses) to loved ones. These gifts can be more cost-effective than physical items and provide ongoing entertainment or learning opportunities.
Impact: This reduces the accumulation of physical goods and encourages sustainable consumption practices.
4. Virtual experiences: Instead of attending expensive holiday events or parties, consider hosting virtual gatherings with friends and family. Platforms like Zoom or Skype can be used to connect with loved ones for virtual celebrations, games, or activities.
Impact: This can save money on travel expenses and event costs while still allowing for meaningful connections and shared experiences.
Essentially, leveraging digital tools and resources for Christmas celebrations can be cost-effective and positively impact the environment, reducing waste and promoting sustainable consumption practices. Embracing digital alternatives can help make the holiday season more affordable, accessible, and environmentally friendly in the digital age.
What lessons can we extract from the intersection of economic development, sustainability, and the holiday season in the digital age? As we navigate a world shaped by technology and interconnectedness, how can we leverage these lessons to create a more sustainable and prosperous future for all? Through the lens of Christmas traditions and practices, what insights can we gain about balancing economic growth with environmental stewardship? Join us in exploring the implications of applying lessons from the holiday season to broader economic development and sustainability issues in the digital era.
The Christmas season in the digital age offers several lessons for economic development and sustainability that can be applied more broadly to society:
1. Embracing innovation: The digital age has transformed traditional holiday practices, encouraging individuals and businesses to adapt to new technologies and digital platforms. This demonstrates the importance of embracing innovation and leveraging technology for economic development and sustainability. By adopting digital solutions, businesses can streamline operations, reduce costs, and reach wider audiences, leading to economic growth and increased sustainability.
2. Sustainable consumption: The shift towards digital alternatives for gift-giving, decorations, and celebrations during the Christmas season highlights the importance of sustainable consumption practices. Individuals can decrease their environmental impact by choosing digital gifts, reducing packaging waste, minimising energy consumption through virtual gatherings and contributing to a more sustainable future. These practices can be applied year-round to promote responsible consumption and minimise resource depletion.
3. Global connectivity: The digital age has facilitated global connectivity and communication, allowing individuals to connect with loved ones, businesses, and communities worldwide. This interconnectedness offers opportunities for economic development through international trade, collaboration, and knowledge sharing. By leveraging digital platforms for networking and cooperation, countries can foster economic growth, innovation, and sustainable development on a global scale.
4. Flexibility and resilience: The digital age has underscored the importance of flexibility and resilience in adapting to rapidly changing circumstances. The ability to pivot to online platforms, remote work, and virtual events during the Christmas season demonstrates the value of agility and adaptability in navigating economic challenges and environmental risks. By fostering a culture of flexibility and resilience, individuals and organisations can better respond to crises, promote economic development, and enhance sustainability in an uncertain world.
Coherently, the Christmas season in the digital age offers valuable lessons for economic development and sustainability, emphasizing the role of innovation, sustainable consumption, global connectivity, and resilience in shaping a more prosperous and sustainable future for humanity. By applying these lessons to broader societal contexts, we can work towards building a more resilient, inclusive, and sustainable economy for all.
What are the consequences of taking the wrong approach to Christmas Day in the digital age? How can we course-correct and ensure that our celebrations in this technology-driven era are meaningful and fulfilling? Join us as we delve into the potential pitfalls of our current approach to the holiday season and consider alternative paths that prioritise connection, authenticity, and joy in the digital age.
While the digital age has brought about numerous benefits and opportunities for celebrating Christmas, there are also potential pitfalls and wrong approaches that can detract from the holiday spirit. Here are some examples of the wrong approach to Christmas Day in the digital age:
1. Overemphasis on materialism: With the convenience of online shopping and digital gift-giving, there is a risk of placing too much emphasis on material possessions and consumerism during Christmas. The pressure to buy extravagant gifts or showcase a perfect holiday on social media can lead to a focus on material wealth rather than the true meaning of Christmas, such as love, kindness, and family.
2. Disconnecting from loved ones: While digital technologies can help us stay connected with friends and family members who are physically distant, there is a risk of using these tools as a substitute for meaningful face-to-face interactions. Spending excessive time on smartphones, social media, or gaming during Christmas Day can detract from the joy of spending quality time with loved ones and building genuine relationships.
3. Environmental impact: The increased use of electronic devices, online shopping, and digital decorations during Christmas can have a significant environmental impact, contributing to electronic waste, energy consumption, and carbon emissions. Failing to consider the environmental consequences of our digital activities during the holiday season can undermine sustainability efforts and harm the planet in the long run.
4. Digital overload: The constant bombardment of digital messages, advertisements, and notifications during Christmas Day can lead to information overload and digital fatigue. Spending excessive time online, engaging in virtual events, or constantly checking social media feeds can detract from mindfulness, relaxation, and in-person interactions, ultimately diminishing the joy and peace of the holiday season.
Notably, the wrong approach to Christmas Day in the digital age involves prioritising materialism over spiritual values, disconnecting from loved ones in favor of digital distractions, ignoring the environmental impact of digital activities, and succumbing to digital overload. By being mindful of these potential pitfalls and striking a balance between digital and real-world experiences, we can ensure a more meaningful, sustainable, and enjoyable Christmas celebration for all.
In conclusion, as we navigate the digital age and embrace the conveniences and opportunities it offers, we must reflect on our approach to celebrating Christmas and ensure we do not lose sight of the true essence of the holiday season. By being mindful of the potential pitfalls discussed, such as materialism, digital disconnect, environmental impact, and digital overload, we can strive to cultivate meaningful and sustainable Christmas celebrations that promote love, kindness, and genuine connections with loved ones. By striking a balance between our digital interactions and real-world experiences, we can uphold the values of Christmas and create lasting memories that transcend the fleeting nature of technology. Ultimately, by approaching Christmas Day in the digital age with intentionality and mindfulness, we can ensure a more enriching, fulfilling, and meaningful holiday season for ourselves and those around us.

♦ Professor Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is a Nigerian Professor of Cyber Security and Information Technology Management, and holds a Chartered Manager Status, and by extension, Chartered Fellow (CMgr FCMI) by the highly Reputable Royal Chartered Management Institute. 

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Anthony Obi Ogbo

When Air Power Becomes a Christmas Performance: The Illusion of Success in Trump’s Nigerian Strike

Published

2 weeks ago

on

December 28, 2025

By

“Bombs alone do not defeat ideology. Precision without intelligence is noise.“ —Anthony Obi Ogbo

When President Trump announced his authorized United States air strike against ISIL (ISIS) fighters in northwest Nigeria on Christmas Day, there was an immediate burst of celebration on Nigerian social media. For a country exhausted by years of kidnappings, massacres, and territorial insecurity, the announcement sounded like long-awaited international support. Memes circulated, praise poured in, and some Nigerians hailed Trump as a decisive global sheriff finally willing to act where others hesitated.

But after the initial euphoria settled, a sobering assessment emerged: the strike appeared less like a strategic military intervention and more like a made-for-television spectacle designed to burnish Trump’s international strongman image.

This was not the first time the United States has launched air strikes in Africa or the Sahel under the banner of counterterrorism. From Libya to Somalia, from Syria to Yemen, U.S. “precision strikes” have often been announced with confidence and celebrated with press briefings—only for the targeted groups to regroup, mutate, and, in some cases, expand their reach. In Nigeria itself, years of foreign-backed security assistance have failed to decisively neutralize Boko Haram or its ISIS-affiliated offshoots. Instead, violence has fragmented, spread, and grown more complex.

No verifiable evidence has been produced to confirm high-value ISIS targets were eliminated

The Nigerian strike followed a familiar pattern. U.S. officials framed it as a blow against ISIS-West Africa Province (ISWAP), a group aligned with the global ISIS network. Trump’s language suggested a decisive intervention—an act of muscular diplomacy signaling that America still projects power where it chooses. Yet no verifiable evidence has been produced to confirm high-value ISIS targets were eliminated, leadership structures dismantled, or operational capacity degraded.

What followed was a digital smokescreen. Social media accounts, many anonymous and unverified, began circulating gruesome images of dead bodies and destroyed villages—photos long associated with banditry in Nigeria’s northwest. These images were quickly repurposed to “prove” the success of Trump’s strike. However, this is where the narrative falls apart under scrutiny.

Trump’s mission, as publicly stated, was to target ISIS. Not bandits. Not kidnappers. Not rural criminal gangs. ISIS is a transnational terrorist organization with ideological, financial, and operational links across continents. Bandits, by contrast, are primarily armed criminal groups—motivated by ransom, cattle theft, and territorial control, not global jihad. Conflating the two may be politically convenient, but it is analytically dishonest.

Killing or displacing bandits does not equate to dismantling ISIS. In fact, indiscriminate or poorly targeted air strikes often worsen the situation, pushing criminal groups to radicalize, splinter, or align with extremist factions for protection and legitimacy. This pattern has been observed repeatedly in conflict zones where military force substitutes for intelligence-driven strategy.

A truly successful counterterrorism raid is not measured by dramatic announcements or viral images. It is measured by clear, verifiable outcomes, including the confirmed elimination of high-ranking commanders, disruption of recruitment and financing networks, seizure of weapons caches, and—most importantly—sustained reductions in civilian attacks. None of these benchmarks has been credibly demonstrated in the aftermath of Trump’s Nigerian air strike.

Instead, Nigeria wakes up to the same grim reality: villages remain vulnerable, highways unsafe, and communities terrorized. The strike did not change the security equation. It did not empower Nigerian forces. It did not restore civilian confidence. And it certainly did not neutralize ISIS as a strategic threat.

This air strike offered Nigerians symbolism, not security.

In that sense, the air strike was not merely ineffective—it was a failure dressed in the language of strength, executed for optics, and amplified for political gain. It offered Nigerians symbolism, not security.

If the goal is truly to eliminate ISIS and its affiliates in West Africa, the path is neither theatrical nor unilateral. It requires robust intelligence sharing, sustained training, and real-time coordination with Nigerian and regional forces. It demands targeted arms assistance, logistical support, and investments in surveillance capabilities that allow local militaries to act decisively and lawfully. Above all, it requires a long-term commitment to strengthening state capacity—not fleeting air shows announced from afar.

Bombs alone do not defeat ideology. Precision without intelligence is noise. And celebration without results is self-deception. Trump’s Nigerian air strike may have produced headlines, but history will remember it for what it was: a failed mission masquerading as success.

♦ Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Anthony Obi Ogbo

Trump’s Nigeria Strike: Bombs, Boasts, and the Illusion of Victory

Published

2 weeks ago

on

December 26, 2025

By

“With Obama, Al-Qaeda was not eliminated by noise; it was suffocated by intelligence.“ —Anthony Obi Ogbo

It has now been confirmed that the United States acted in collaboration with Nigeria in the recent strike on Islamic State elements in northwest Nigeria. That cooperation deserves recognition. Intelligence-sharing between Washington and Abuja is necessary, overdue, and welcome. Terrorism is transnational; defeating it requires allies, not isolation.

But let us be clear: bombs alone do not defeat terror. And Donald Trump’s strike—trumpeted loudly on social media before facts, casualties, or strategy were disclosed—was less a turning point than a performance.

Trump’s announcement was a classic spectacle: “powerful,” “deadly,” “perfect strikes.” No numbers. No clarity. No accountability. Just noise. It was the same choreography America has deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Somalia—places where U.S. airpower landed hard, headlines screamed victory, and instability deepened afterward. Violence escalated. Militancy adapted. Civilians paid the price.

History is unkind to airstrikes sold as solutions.

Nigeria knows this better than anyone. Long before Trump’s tweet, the Nigerian military had already conducted multiple operations in the same terror corridor. At least five major strikes and offensives stand out:

  • First, Operation Hadarin Daji, launched to dismantle bandit and terror camps across Zamfara, Katsina, and Sokoto, involving sustained air and ground assaults.
  • Second, Operation Tsaftan Daji, which targeted terrorist hideouts in the Kamuku and Sububu forests—precisely the terrain now in the headlines.
  • Third, repeated Nigerian Air Force precision strikes in the Zurmi–Shinkafi axis, neutralizing commanders and destroying logistics hubs.
  • Fourth, joint operations with Nigerien forces, disrupting cross-border supply routes used by ISIS-linked groups.
  • Fifth, recent coordinated offensives involving intelligence-led raids, special forces insertions, and follow-up ground clearing in the northwest.

These were not symbolic gestures. They were Nigerian-led, Nigerian-funded, Nigerian-executed. And yet, there were no fireworks on social media. No flag-waving hysteria. No intoxicated praise of Nigerian commanders as saviors of civilization.

Why? Because there is a dangerous segment of Nigerians who suffer from what can only be called the American Wonder mentality—a colonial hangover that applauds anything louder simply because it comes from Washington. The same Nigerians who ignore their own soldiers dying in silence suddenly abandon Christmas meals to celebrate Trump’s tweets, typing incoherent praise, mangling grammar, and mistaking spectacle for substance.

It is embarrassing. And it is intellectually lazy.

Terrorism is not defeated by volume or virality. It is defeated by intelligence—quiet, patient, unglamorous work. The United States knows this. Barack Obama understood it. Al-Qaeda was not dismantled through social media theatrics or chest-thumping declarations. It was weakened through intelligence fusion, financial disruption, targeted operations, local partnerships, and relentless pressure on leadership networks—mostly without fanfare.

Obama did not tweet. He acted. So what actually works against groups like ISIS in Nigeria?

First, intelligence supremacy. Human intelligence from local communities, defectors, and infiltrators matters more than bombs. Terror groups survive on secrecy. Break that, and they collapse.

Second, financial and logistical strangulation. Terrorists run on money, fuel, arms, and food. Cut access to smuggling routes, illicit mining, ransom flows, and cross-border trade, and their operational capacity withers.

Third, community stabilization and governance. Terrorism thrives where the state is absent. Roads, schools, policing, and justice systems matter. People who trust the state do not shelter terrorists.

Fourth, regional coordination, not episodic strikes. Nigeria, Niger, Chad, and Burkina Faso must sustain joint pressure, not reactive operations driven by headlines.

Airstrikes can support these strategies—but only as tools, never as substitutes.

Trump’s strike may have killed militants. It may have disrupted camps. That is commendable. But it is not a solution. It is a moment. And moments, without strategy, fade.

If Nigerians truly want terror defeated, they should stop worshiping foreign loudness and start demanding disciplined intelligence, consistent policy, and respect for the men and women already fighting on the ground.

Real victories are quiet. Real security is built, not tweeted.

♦ Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Anthony Obi Ogbo

Texas’ 18th Congressional District Runoff: Amanda Edwards Deserves This Seat

Published

3 weeks ago

on

December 18, 2025

By

“Her persistence and long-term investment make a clear case: she has earned this opportunity.“ —Anthony Obi Ogbo

In the special election to fill Texas’s 18th Congressional District, no candidate won a majority on November 4, 2025, leading to a January 31, 2026, runoff between Democratic frontrunners Christian Menefee and Amanda Edwards. Menefee, Harris County Attorney, led the field with roughly 29% of the vote, while former Houston City Council member Edwards finished second with about 26%. Both are vying to represent a district left vacant after the death of U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner.

The 18th Congressional District is far more than a geographic area. Anchored in Houston’s historic Black communities, it is a political and cultural stronghold shaped by civil rights history, faith institutions, and grassroots activism. Sheila Jackson Lee represented this district for nearly three decades (1995–2024), becoming more than a legislator—she was a constant presence at churches, funerals, protests, and community milestones. For residents, her leadership carried spiritual weight, reflecting stewardship, protection, and a deep, almost pastoral guardianship of the district. Her tenure symbolized continuity, cultural pride, and a profound connection with the people she served.

Houstonians watched as Jackson Lee entered the 2023 Houston mayoral race, attempting to transition from Congress to city leadership. Despite high-profile endorsements, including outgoing Mayor Sylvester Turner and national Democratic figures, she lost the December 9, 2023, runoff to State Senator John Whitmire by a wide margin. Following that defeat, Jackson Lee filed to run for re-election to her U.S. House seat, even as Edwards—who had briefly joined the mayoral race before withdrawing—remained in the congressional primary.

At that time, Jackson Lee’s health was visibly declining, yet voters still supported her, honoring decades of service. She defeated Edwards in the 2024 Democratic primary before announcing her battle with pancreatic cancer. Her passing in July 2024 left the seat vacant.

Edwards, already a candidate, sought to fill the seat, but timing and party rules intervened. Because Jackson Lee died too late for a regular primary, Harris County Democratic Party precinct chairs selected a replacement nominee. Former Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner, a retired but widely respected figure, narrowly edged out Edwards for the nomination, effectively blocking her despite her prior campaigning efforts. Turner won the general election but died in March 2025, triggering a special election in 2025, in which Edwards advanced to a runoff.

The January 31, 2026, runoff will hinge on turnout, coalition-building, and key endorsements. Both candidates led a crowded November field but fell short of a majority, with Menefee narrowly ahead. Endorsements such as State Rep. Jolanda Jones’ support for Edwards could consolidate key Democratic blocs, particularly among Black women and progressive voters. In a heavily Democratic district where voter confusion and turnout patterns have been inconsistent, the candidate who best mobilizes supporters and unites constituencies is likely to prevail.

Amanda Edwards’ case is compelling. Although both candidates share similar values and qualifications, her claim rests on dedication, consistency, and timing that have been repeatedly denied. She pursued this seat with focus and purpose, maintaining a steady commitment to the district and its future. Her path was interrupted by the prolonged political ambitions of Jackson Lee and Turner—figures whose stature reshaped the race but delayed generational transition. Edwards did not step aside; she remained visible, engaged, and prepared. In a moment demanding both continuity and renewal, her persistence and long-term investment make a clear case: she has earned this opportunity.

This race comes down to trust, perseverance, and demonstrated commitment. Amanda Edwards has consistently shown up for the district, even when political circumstances repeatedly delayed her chance. Her dedication reflects readiness, respect for the electorate, and an unwavering commitment to service. Voting for Amanda Edwards is not only justified—it is the right choice for Houston’s 18th Congressional District.

♦Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Latest posts by Texas Guardian News (see all)
Continue Reading

Trending