Connect with us

Column

Strengthening Nigeria’s Democracy: Government-Citizen Synergies and the Spirit of June 12

Published

on

The strength of a nation’s democracy lies in the synergies between its government and its citizens, working together to overcome challenges and fully embrace democratic values. As we commemorate the June 12 celebration of Democracy in Nigeria, the significance of this day serves as a reminder of the struggles and sacrifices made for democratic ideals. In Nigeria, the relationship between the government and citizens is crucial to the integrity and sustainability of the democratic system. By fostering transparency, inclusivity, civic engagement, and conflict resolution, the government and citizens can build a stronger democracy that benefits all members of society. In this discussion, we explore how the government and citizens can collaborate to overcome current challenges to Nigeria’s democracy and fully enjoy the dividends of democratic governance, in honour of the spirit of June 12.

As we celebrate Democracy Day in Nigeria on June 12 and reflect on the transformation of our nation, it is important to remember that many people still dwell on “if only” scenarios. They focus on what they lack and overlook the blessings they have. This mindset not only fosters sadness but also wastes time and happiness. Instead of being grateful for the progress we have made, some let imaginary desires overshadow their lives. Let us all pause to appreciate what we have achieved and embrace the joy it brings. Let us continue to strive for a better future while appreciating the present.
As we come together to celebrate Democracy Day in Nigeria on June 12, it is crucial to acknowledge the reality that many individuals within our nation continue to dwell on the “if only” scenarios. These individuals tend to fixate on what they perceive to be lacking in their lives, often neglecting the abundance of blessings that already surround them. This mindset not only fosters a sense of despair but also results in wasted time and missed opportunities for genuine happiness and fulfilment.
In light of this, we need to consider how this mindset may be hindering our collective progress as a nation. Instead of being appreciative of the strides we have made, some individuals allow their unfounded desires and grievances to overshadow their ability to engage effectively in the growth and development of our country. This not only holds us back as a society but also prevents us from fully realizing the potential for transformation and prosperity that lies within our grasp.
Therefore, on this occasion of celebration and reflection, let us all take a moment to appreciate the progress we have achieved as a nation. Let us acknowledge the challenges and shortcomings that still exist but remain committed to actively participating in the journey towards a more inclusive and prosperous Nigeria. We must work together, combining the efforts and energies of all citizens, without leaving anyone behind.
By embracing the diversity and strength of our nation, and by actively engaging in the processes of democracy and governance, we can pave the way for a more unified and whole Nigeria. Let us use this celebration as an opportunity to rally together, to bridge the gaps that divide us, and to ensure that every voice is heard and every individual is included in shaping the future of our beloved country. Only through collective action and genuine collaboration can we truly achieve the wholeness and transformation that we all aspire towards.
To deliver the dividends of democracy to the citizens during this celebratory time of Democracy Day in Nigeria, the government must take concrete actions beyond mere wishful thinking and “if only” scenarios. Here are some key steps that the government can take to ensure that the benefits of democracy are effectively and efficiently realized by the citizens:
1. Transparency and Accountability: The government must prioritize transparency and accountability in all its dealings and decisions. By ensuring that resources are utilized responsibly and that information is readily available to the public, the government can build trust and ensure that citizens are aware of how democracy is being utilized to improve their lives.
2. Inclusivity and Participation: The government must actively involve citizens in the decision-making processes that affect their lives. By engaging with diverse communities and ensuring that all voices are heard, the government can foster a sense of ownership and participation among citizens, leading to more effective and impactful policies.
3. Service Delivery and Infrastructure Development: The government must prioritize the delivery of essential services and the development of critical infrastructure that are necessary for the well-being and progress of its citizens. This includes improving healthcare, education, transportation, and other key sectors that directly impact the quality of life for all Nigerians.
4. Economic Empowerment and Job Creation: The government must implement policies and initiatives that promote economic empowerment and create opportunities for job creation. By investing in skills development, entrepreneurship, and sustainable economic growth, the government can uplift individuals and communities out of poverty and towards prosperity.
5. Rule of Law and Justice: The government must uphold the rule of law and ensure that justice is accessible to all citizens. By promoting a fair and impartial judicial system, the government can protect the rights and freedoms of all individuals and ensure that democracy is upheld in all aspects of society.
By taking these concrete actions and moving beyond mere rhetoric and “if only” scenarios, the government can truly deliver the dividends of democracy to the citizens of Nigeria. These steps must be taken with a sense of urgency and commitment, to ensure that democracy is not just a concept but a tangible reality that positively impacts the lives of all Nigerians.
In the spirit of June 12, a momentous celebration of democracy in Nigeria, it is crucial for citizens to reflect on their role in upholding and strengthening this crucial aspect of governance. As we commemorate this significant day in the nation’s history, it is vital for individuals to consider what actions they must take to maintain and enhance the integrity of our democracy for the collective interest of nation-building. This requires active participation, vigilance, and a commitment to democratic principles, ensuring that the voices of the people are heard and respected in the governance process. By fostering government-citizen synergies and embodying the spirit of June 12, we can work towards a stronger, more inclusive democracy that serves the needs and aspirations of all Nigerians.
The celebration of June 12 as Democracy Day in Nigeria serves as a reminder of the struggles and sacrifices made to entrench democratic ideals in our nation. As we mark this important occasion, it is imperative that we reflect on the significance of democracy and the responsibilities it entails.
Essentially, the preservation and advancement of our democracy require collective effort and continuous engagement from all citizens. By actively participating in the democratic process, holding leaders accountable, and advocating for transparency and good governance, we can contribute to the strength and resilience of our democracy. Let us honor the spirit of June 12 by committing to upholding democratic values and working towards a more equitable and prosperous future for all Nigerians.
Permit me to reaccentuate on this further. Citizens play a crucial role in upholding and strengthening democracy in Nigeria. To keep democracy intact and promote nation-building, citizens must actively engage in the democratic process and take responsibility for their roles in shaping the future of the country. Here are some key actions that citizens can take to contribute to a stronger and more vibrant democracy:
1. Active Participation: Citizens should actively participate in the democratic process by exercising their right to vote in elections, engaging in civic education, attending town hall meetings, and voicing their opinions on important issues. By being informed and active participants, citizens can hold their elected representatives accountable and ensure that democratic principles are upheld.
2. Respect for Rule of Law: Citizens should respect the rule of law and abide by the constitution and legal frameworks that govern the country. By respecting the rights and freedoms of others, citizens can contribute to a peaceful and inclusive society that upholds the rule of law.
3. Promote Political Inclusivity: Citizens should promote political inclusivity by supporting diversity and representation in government. By advocating for equal opportunities for all citizens to participate in politics, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or socio-economic background, citizens can help build a more inclusive democracy that reflects the diversity of the population.
4. Civic Engagement and Advocacy: Citizens should engage in civic advocacy and activism to promote social justice, human rights, and good governance. By joining civil society organizations, participating in peaceful protests, and advocating for positive change, citizens can influence policy decisions and hold government accountable for its actions.
5. Education and Awareness: Citizens should prioritize education and awareness about democratic principles, human rights, and governance. By staying informed about current events, understanding their rights and responsibilities as citizens, and promoting civic education in schools and communities, citizens can build a strong foundation for democracy and nation-building.
Overall, citizens play a critical role in upholding and strengthening democracy in Nigeria. By actively participating in the democratic process, respecting the rule of law, promoting inclusivity, engaging in advocacy, and prioritizing education and awareness, citizens can contribute to a vibrant democracy that promotes peace, prosperity, and nation-building. It is through the collective efforts of all citizens that democracy can be preserved and strengthened for the benefit of current and future generations.
In light of the commemoration of June 12 as Nigeria’s Democracy Day, it is crucial to examine the collaborative efforts needed between the government and citizens to address the current challenges facing our democracy. As we reflect on the significance of this important day, we must consider the synergies that can be fostered between all stakeholders to uphold democratic values and overcome obstacles impeding the full realization of a vibrant democratic society. By working together, both the government and citizens can contribute to the strengthening of our nation’s democratic institutions, ensuring that the voices of the people are heard and respected in the decision-making processes. This collaborative approach is essential for tackling issues such as transparency, accountability, and inclusivity, ultimately paving the way for a more robust and responsive democratic system.
Synergies between the government and citizens are essential to overcoming current challenges to Nigeria’s democracy and fully enjoying democratic values. Here are some key ways in which the government and citizens can collaborate to strengthen democracy and address challenges:
1. Transparency and Accountability: The government should prioritize transparency and accountability in its actions and decision-making processes. By providing citizens with access to information, engaging in open dialogue, and being accountable for their actions, the government can build trust with the citizens and promote a culture of transparency in governance.
Citizens, on the other hand, can hold the government accountable by demanding transparency, asking questions, and monitoring government activities. By actively participating in oversight mechanisms, such as budget monitoring, citizen audits, and public hearings, citizens can ensure that the government is accountable and responsive to their needs.
2. Inclusive Governance: The government should prioritize inclusive governance by ensuring that all voices are heard and considered in the decision-making process. By consulting with citizens, civil society organizations, and other stakeholders, the government can develop policies and programs that reflect the diverse needs and interests of the population.
Citizens can contribute to inclusive governance by actively participating in community meetings, policy discussions, and other forums where their voices can be heard. By advocating for inclusivity and representation, citizens can help ensure that government policies are responsive to the needs of all citizens, including marginalized groups.
3. Civic Education and Engagement: The government should invest in civic education programs that promote awareness of democratic values, rights, and responsibilities among citizens. By providing access to information and resources that empower citizens to participate in the democratic process, the government can strengthen citizen engagement and promote a culture of democracy.
Citizens can also take responsibility for their own civic education by staying informed, participating in civic activities, and engaging in dialogue with government officials. By educating themselves about democratic principles and processes, citizens can become more effective advocates for democracy and contribute to positive change in their communities.
4. Conflict Resolution and Dialogue: The government and citizens should prioritize peaceful conflict resolution and dialogue to address differences and build consensus. By fostering a culture of dialogue and respect for diverse perspectives, the government can prevent conflicts from escalating and promote social cohesion.
Citizens can also play a role in conflict resolution by engaging in peaceful dialogue, promoting understanding and tolerance, and advocating for nonviolent solutions to disputes. By building bridges across divides and fostering a culture of dialogue, citizens can contribute to a more peaceful and inclusive society.
Overall, synergies between the government and citizens are crucial to overcoming challenges to Nigeria’s democracy and fully enjoying democratic values. By prioritizing transparency and accountability, promoting inclusive governance, investing in civic education and engagement, and fostering conflict resolution and dialogue, the government and citizens can work together to strengthen democracy and promote a more prosperous and inclusive society.
In conclusion, as we reflect on the synergies between the government and citizens in strengthening Nigeria’s democracy, we must also acknowledge the significance of the June 12 celebration of Democracy in inspiring us to uphold democratic values and principles. The struggles and sacrifices of the past serve as a reminder of the importance of unity, inclusivity, and active participation in building a more robust democratic society. By infusing the spirit of June 12 into our collaborative efforts, the government and citizens can work together to address challenges, promote dialogue, and advance the cause of democracy. Through this partnership, we can build a society where all voices are heard and all citizens can actively participate in shaping the future of our nation. By harnessing the power of synergies between the government and citizens, we can overcome obstacles, foster social cohesion, and build a more prosperous and democratic Nigeria for generations to come, in celebration of the ideals of June 12.

♦ Professor Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is a Nigerian Professor of Cyber Security and Information Technology Management, and holds a Chartered Manager Status, and by extension, Chartered Fellow (CMgr FCMI) by the highly Reputable Royal Chartered Management Institute.

Texas Guardian News

Anthony Obi Ogbo

From Threats to Partnership: How Diplomacy Repositioned Nigeria in Washington

Published

on

Nigeria reframed terrorism, corrected Washington’s lens, and secured cooperation —a  pure anatomy of diplomatic turnaround —Anthony Obi Ogbo

Nigeria’s recent engagement of a United States–based lobbying firm under a reported $9 million contract was widely scrutinized, predictably misunderstood by some, and quietly effective. The objective was clear: to shape Washington’s understanding of Nigeria’s complex security challenges—particularly violence affecting Christian communities—within an accurate geopolitical, intelligence, and regional framework. Such engagements are not unusual. In fact, they are a routine and essential feature of modern international diplomacy, allowing governments to clarify policy positions, counter distorted narratives, and ensure that domestic security crises are not flattened into simplistic talking points for foreign consumption.

In an era where global perception can influence aid, sanctions, military cooperation, and diplomatic goodwill, strategic communication has become inseparable from national security. Nigeria’s decision to professionally engage Washington signaled an understanding that security today is fought not only on the battlefield but also in briefing rooms, policy memos, and diplomatic corridors.

Evidence suggests that this recalibration has begun to yield results. Just days ago, former U.S. President Donald Trump publicly acknowledged—belatedly—that Muslims are equally among the primary victims of ISIS terrorism. It was a striking rhetorical shift for a political figure who had long leaned on broad, inflammatory framing that blurred the distinction between extremist violence and religious identity. That admission did not emerge in a vacuum. It followed sustained pressure from global security analysts, regional experts, and Muslim leaders who have repeatedly challenged the false narrative that terrorism is rooted in faith rather than criminal ideology, geopolitical instability, and organized violence.

More importantly, the acknowledgment coincided with tangible policy movement. Trump-aligned U.S. security networks have quietly expanded counterterrorism cooperation with Nigeria under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration. This development underscores a pragmatic recognition that effective counterterrorism is not achieved through threats, isolation, or performative rhetoric, but through partnership, intelligence sharing, and regional capacity building.

This week, the United States delivered fresh military supplies to Nigeria to support ongoing security operations. The delivery followed recent U.S. air strikes against Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) targets, carried out at Nigeria’s formal request. While air strikes often attract public attention, the more consequential story lies beneath the surface: a shift toward coordinated intelligence operations, logistical support, and sustained military collaboration. This is not symbolic diplomacy. It is functional, operational alignment.

Contrast this moment with an earlier chapter in Nigeria–U.S. relations. During the Jonathan administration, Nigeria experienced significant difficulties in its diplomatic engagement with Washington. Rather than relying on seasoned foreign policy professionals, security strategists, and international communications experts, the government leaned heavily on local intermediaries and political loyalists to interpret and convey Nigeria’s position abroad. The result was a weakened diplomatic posture, fragmented messaging, and persistent misinterpretation of Nigeria’s internal security realities. Critical issues—ranging from Boko Haram’s evolution to regional insurgency dynamics—were often viewed through incomplete or distorted lenses.

That experience offered a lasting lesson: goodwill alone does not translate into influence. In global politics, perception must be managed as deliberately as policy. Strategic silence, amateur diplomacy, or reactive communication leaves a vacuum—one that is quickly filled by external narratives, advocacy groups, or political opportunists with their own agendas.

What has changed now is not merely tone, but method. Nigeria’s current approach reflects an understanding that diplomacy is not capitulation, and lobbying is not a sign of weakness. It is leverage. It is preparation. It is the disciplined articulation of national interest in a language that global power centers understand. By engaging professionally, Nigeria reframed its security narrative—not as a sectarian failure, but as a shared counterterrorism challenge that requires international coordination.

Even Donald Trump’s posture illustrates this transformation. A leader who once relied on threats, ultimatums, and rhetorical spectacle has now, through institutional channels, become part of a support framework working with regional actors to strengthen security and civilian protection. The shift is not ideological; it is a strategic move. And it reflects the enduring truth that diplomacy often succeeds where bluster fails.

In international politics, power is not only measured by firepower or economic weight, but by the ability to persuade, align, and sustain cooperation. Nigeria’s recent experience is a reminder that nations are not judged solely by their crises, but by how effectively they explain, manage, and confront them on the global stage. Diplomacy, when practiced with clarity and professionalism, does not dilute sovereignty—it reinforces it.

♦ Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Continue Reading

Anthony Obi Ogbo

When Air Power Becomes a Christmas Performance: The Illusion of Success in Trump’s Nigerian Strike

Published

on

Bombs alone do not defeat ideology. Precision without intelligence is noise. —Anthony Obi Ogbo

When President Trump announced his authorized United States air strike against ISIL (ISIS) fighters in northwest Nigeria on Christmas Day, there was an immediate burst of celebration on Nigerian social media. For a country exhausted by years of kidnappings, massacres, and territorial insecurity, the announcement sounded like long-awaited international support. Memes circulated, praise poured in, and some Nigerians hailed Trump as a decisive global sheriff finally willing to act where others hesitated.

But after the initial euphoria settled, a sobering assessment emerged: the strike appeared less like a strategic military intervention and more like a made-for-television spectacle designed to burnish Trump’s international strongman image.

This was not the first time the United States has launched air strikes in Africa or the Sahel under the banner of counterterrorism. From Libya to Somalia, from Syria to Yemen, U.S. “precision strikes” have often been announced with confidence and celebrated with press briefings—only for the targeted groups to regroup, mutate, and, in some cases, expand their reach. In Nigeria itself, years of foreign-backed security assistance have failed to decisively neutralize Boko Haram or its ISIS-affiliated offshoots. Instead, violence has fragmented, spread, and grown more complex.

No verifiable evidence has been produced to confirm high-value ISIS targets were eliminated

The Nigerian strike followed a familiar pattern. U.S. officials framed it as a blow against ISIS-West Africa Province (ISWAP), a group aligned with the global ISIS network. Trump’s language suggested a decisive intervention—an act of muscular diplomacy signaling that America still projects power where it chooses. Yet no verifiable evidence has been produced to confirm high-value ISIS targets were eliminated, leadership structures dismantled, or operational capacity degraded.

What followed was a digital smokescreen. Social media accounts, many anonymous and unverified, began circulating gruesome images of dead bodies and destroyed villages—photos long associated with banditry in Nigeria’s northwest. These images were quickly repurposed to “prove” the success of Trump’s strike. However, this is where the narrative falls apart under scrutiny.

Trump’s mission, as publicly stated, was to target ISIS. Not bandits. Not kidnappers. Not rural criminal gangs. ISIS is a transnational terrorist organization with ideological, financial, and operational links across continents. Bandits, by contrast, are primarily armed criminal groups—motivated by ransom, cattle theft, and territorial control, not global jihad. Conflating the two may be politically convenient, but it is analytically dishonest.

Killing or displacing bandits does not equate to dismantling ISIS. In fact, indiscriminate or poorly targeted air strikes often worsen the situation, pushing criminal groups to radicalize, splinter, or align with extremist factions for protection and legitimacy. This pattern has been observed repeatedly in conflict zones where military force substitutes for intelligence-driven strategy.

A truly successful counterterrorism raid is not measured by dramatic announcements or viral images. It is measured by clear, verifiable outcomes, including the confirmed elimination of high-ranking commanders, disruption of recruitment and financing networks, seizure of weapons caches, and—most importantly—sustained reductions in civilian attacks. None of these benchmarks has been credibly demonstrated in the aftermath of Trump’s Nigerian air strike.

Instead, Nigeria wakes up to the same grim reality: villages remain vulnerable, highways unsafe, and communities terrorized. The strike did not change the security equation. It did not empower Nigerian forces. It did not restore civilian confidence. And it certainly did not neutralize ISIS as a strategic threat.

This air strike offered Nigerians symbolism, not security.

In that sense, the air strike was not merely ineffective—it was a failure dressed in the language of strength, executed for optics, and amplified for political gain. It offered Nigerians symbolism, not security.

If the goal is truly to eliminate ISIS and its affiliates in West Africa, the path is neither theatrical nor unilateral. It requires robust intelligence sharing, sustained training, and real-time coordination with Nigerian and regional forces. It demands targeted arms assistance, logistical support, and investments in surveillance capabilities that allow local militaries to act decisively and lawfully. Above all, it requires a long-term commitment to strengthening state capacity—not fleeting air shows announced from afar.

Bombs alone do not defeat ideology. Precision without intelligence is noise. And celebration without results is self-deception. Trump’s Nigerian air strike may have produced headlines, but history will remember it for what it was: a failed mission masquerading as success.

♦ Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Continue Reading

Anthony Obi Ogbo

Trump’s Nigeria Strike: Bombs, Boasts, and the Illusion of Victory

Published

on

With Obama, Al-Qaeda was not eliminated by noise; it was suffocated by intelligence. —Anthony Obi Ogbo

It has now been confirmed that the United States acted in collaboration with Nigeria in the recent strike on Islamic State elements in northwest Nigeria. That cooperation deserves recognition. Intelligence-sharing between Washington and Abuja is necessary, overdue, and welcome. Terrorism is transnational; defeating it requires allies, not isolation.

But let us be clear: bombs alone do not defeat terror. And Donald Trump’s strike—trumpeted loudly on social media before facts, casualties, or strategy were disclosed—was less a turning point than a performance.

Trump’s announcement was a classic spectacle: “powerful,” “deadly,” “perfect strikes.” No numbers. No clarity. No accountability. Just noise. It was the same choreography America has deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Somalia—places where U.S. airpower landed hard, headlines screamed victory, and instability deepened afterward. Violence escalated. Militancy adapted. Civilians paid the price.

History is unkind to airstrikes sold as solutions.

Nigeria knows this better than anyone. Long before Trump’s tweet, the Nigerian military had already conducted multiple operations in the same terror corridor. At least five major strikes and offensives stand out:

  • First, Operation Hadarin Daji, launched to dismantle bandit and terror camps across Zamfara, Katsina, and Sokoto, involving sustained air and ground assaults.
  • Second, Operation Tsaftan Daji, which targeted terrorist hideouts in the Kamuku and Sububu forests—precisely the terrain now in the headlines.
  • Third, repeated Nigerian Air Force precision strikes in the Zurmi–Shinkafi axis, neutralizing commanders and destroying logistics hubs.
  • Fourth, joint operations with Nigerien forces, disrupting cross-border supply routes used by ISIS-linked groups.
  • Fifth, recent coordinated offensives involving intelligence-led raids, special forces insertions, and follow-up ground clearing in the northwest.

These were not symbolic gestures. They were Nigerian-led, Nigerian-funded, Nigerian-executed. And yet, there were no fireworks on social media. No flag-waving hysteria. No intoxicated praise of Nigerian commanders as saviors of civilization.

Why? Because there is a dangerous segment of Nigerians who suffer from what can only be called the American Wonder mentality—a colonial hangover that applauds anything louder simply because it comes from Washington. The same Nigerians who ignore their own soldiers dying in silence suddenly abandon Christmas meals to celebrate Trump’s tweets, typing incoherent praise, mangling grammar, and mistaking spectacle for substance.

It is embarrassing. And it is intellectually lazy.

Terrorism is not defeated by volume or virality. It is defeated by intelligence—quiet, patient, unglamorous work. The United States knows this. Barack Obama understood it. Al-Qaeda was not dismantled through social media theatrics or chest-thumping declarations. It was weakened through intelligence fusion, financial disruption, targeted operations, local partnerships, and relentless pressure on leadership networks—mostly without fanfare.

Obama did not tweet. He acted. So what actually works against groups like ISIS in Nigeria?

First, intelligence supremacy. Human intelligence from local communities, defectors, and infiltrators matters more than bombs. Terror groups survive on secrecy. Break that, and they collapse.

Second, financial and logistical strangulation. Terrorists run on money, fuel, arms, and food. Cut access to smuggling routes, illicit mining, ransom flows, and cross-border trade, and their operational capacity withers.

Third, community stabilization and governance. Terrorism thrives where the state is absent. Roads, schools, policing, and justice systems matter. People who trust the state do not shelter terrorists.

Fourth, regional coordination, not episodic strikes. Nigeria, Niger, Chad, and Burkina Faso must sustain joint pressure, not reactive operations driven by headlines.

Airstrikes can support these strategies—but only as tools, never as substitutes.

Trump’s strike may have killed militants. It may have disrupted camps. That is commendable. But it is not a solution. It is a moment. And moments, without strategy, fade.

If Nigerians truly want terror defeated, they should stop worshiping foreign loudness and start demanding disciplined intelligence, consistent policy, and respect for the men and women already fighting on the ground.

Real victories are quiet. Real security is built, not tweeted.

♦ Publisher of the Guardian News, Professor Anthony Obi Ogbo, Ph.D., is on the Editorial Board of the West African Pilot News. He is the author of the Influence of Leadership (2015)  and the Maxims of Political Leadership (2019). Contact: anthony@guardiannews.us

Texas Guardian News
Continue Reading

Trending